lol...and some people were trying to convince he could have had a spot on the Habs next year.
Another failed Euro signing by our scouts to add to our to our very long list.
Unless we're planning to make some other moves, I wouldn't mind him fighting it out with Wideman for a spot in the lineup. He was not convincing in his short stints with the team, but we didn't exactly put him in a best position to succeed.he's n0 longer a prospect to me at least as I highly doubt we bring him back but he played his first KHL game and had 2 pts with over 18 mins of TOI.
He signed in the KHL, he's gone...Unless we're planning to make some other moves, I wouldn't mind him fighting it out with Wideman for a spot in the lineup. He was not convincing in his short stints with the team, but we didn't exactly put him in a best position to succeed.
Edmundson - Petry
Romanov - Savard
Chiarot - Leskinen
Kulak - Wideman
I'd rather try that, than rush Norlinder.
Then what was the point in aligning him beside Chiarot on the third pairing?I'm aware of that.
This is a hypothetical scenario.Then what was the point in aligning him beside Chiarot on the third pairing?
I think you kinda got paranoiac on this whole development rushing thing lately lmao.This is a hypothetical scenario.
We let him go. Hopefully, not in order to rush Norlinder.
I think you kinda got paranoiac on this whole development rushing thing lately lmao.
Let's say we would've sent KK back to Finland when he was 18 years old, what exactly do you think would've happened down there that didn't happen here that would've made a huge difference in his development?
At some point, it's hard to ignore the results of our development strategy.
This requires a long answer, but it's enough to say that his physical development would have taken place under much less demanding schedule and much less pressure for immediate results.
Brook has never given any indication of being ready. Hudon only looked ready based on scoring stats. Evans was in the US and had to agree to turn pro.But it was not a straight line of development tactic for everybody... Hudon was marinated in the AHL for years under this same management...
Evans was also somewhat marinated.
Brook is being marinated right now.
I mean it's not like they're playing guys that don't belong.
Who exactly pushed him for results?
He was still getting heavily sheltered even this last season...
No PK, lots of offensive zone starts, and plenty of PP minutes...
Some saying in Facebook he beat out Barron. Hard to believe but MSL generally knows what he is doingBumped the wrong thread sorry~
Leskinen played well so far, aside from that turnover last game. All our young guys on D had those brain farts it comes with inexperience.
It seems MSL loves him, caught a Bob Hartley interview and he had good words for the kid. Certainly looks better on the PP than Wideman or Barron and also better than Shuneman and Bowey in all 3 zones.
Least talked about prospect on D for sure, maybe because he's already 25?
We need him in Montreal, we need him to protect our players and keep the other teams honest. He’s already wayyyy better than Savard in every aspect. He’s fast, good iq, great shot, physical, mobile, he looks like the full package honestly.He played against younger kids and weaker kids this year in the O. He will face men next year at AHL level. We will see.
You sure you are speaking about Leskinen?!We need him in Montreal, we need him to protect our players and keep the other teams honest. He’s already wayyyy better than Savard in every aspect. He’s fast, good iq, great shot, physical, mobile, he looks like the full package honestly.