didn’t play much as a true rookie, lost 17 yr old season to to COVID at 17 then a year plagued by injury …Mayer has played every game since entering the league and sits at 142 gpThe 67s page writeup states:
"Overage forward Kaleb Lawrence appeared in his 100th OHL game, tonight".
100 games only, as an overager? A typo surely? Otherwise maybe he's capable of some serious development this year...
The covid season was his age 17 year and then he only played about four periods of hockey in his age 18 year due to a significant shoulder injury that required surgery. He didn't get fully cleared for contact until just before his age 19 season. I would suspect there is a fair bit of growth and development still to get out of his game which makes the 8th round pick a heck of a steal if he fulfills that potential.The 67s page writeup states:
"Overage forward Kaleb Lawrence appeared in his 100th OHL game, tonight".
100 games only, as an overager? A typo surely? Otherwise maybe he's capable of some serious development this year...
The intention was never to trade Donoso, if that was going to happen it would have been in the pre-season. Teams don't swing to an OA goalie the implications top to bottom rarely can be justified. They will get him his starts to keep him fresh should he be needed, Mack's work load will be increased at a steady pace.
I’d much rather pay ‘27-2nd than ‘24-3rd67s miss out on Chromiak. Reasonable cost.
Could he be traded at the deadline to a rebuilding team who have traded their overages to add stability in goal?You may be right but Donoso needs to play regularly to be effective. Playing as a backup will degrade his game and he’ll be useless for Ottawa. That seems to be the experience he’s had with the 67s. When he plays a lot, he plays hot and steady. When he plays a little, he is inconsistent. If that is the 67s plan, the plan is flawed greatly. I don’t believe he is capable of being a strong backup. He is capable of being a strong starter. He needs to be a starter. That is what is right for him personally and for the 67s by extension.
The intention I think was/is to trade Donoso. The problem in pres seson was that they did not have a backup and the market was really soft.The intention was never to trade Donoso, if that was going to happen it would have been in the pre-season. Teams don't swing to an OA goalie the implications top to bottom rarely can be justified. They will get him his starts to keep him fresh should he be needed, Mack's work load will be increased at a steady pace.
Not really anyone that is rebuilding would want a goalie that is available next season The only teams that will be interested in Dnoso are ones that are either trying to make sure they make the playoffs or trying to get to the finals.Could he be traded at the deadline to a rebuilding team who have traded their overages to add stability in goal?
Flawed or not it was the decision that was made, and now he is a back-up and I'm really not sure a whole lot of options exist in a market that is saturated with OA's.You may be right but Donoso needs to play regularly to be effective. Playing as a backup will degrade his game and he’ll be useless for Ottawa. That seems to be the experience he’s had with the 67s. When he plays a lot, he plays hot and steady. When he plays a little, he is inconsistent. If that is the 67s plan, the plan is flawed greatly. I don’t believe he is capable of being a strong backup. He is capable of being a strong starter. He needs to be a starter. That is what is right for him personally and for the 67s by extension.
Flawed or not it was the decision that was made, and now he is a back-up and I'm really not sure a whole lot of options exist in a market that is saturated with OA's.
Completely agree with all of these points, the challenge of dealing with OA goalies is that they are either needed in a go for it season or collateral damage in a development year where they are expected to mentor through the process and then watch as their career in the OHL closes out.He’s 3.19 and .864% so clearly if that was the decision then it was the wrong decision and I will criticize it for the poor decision it was. It was more important, IMO, to give him an opportunity to play as an OA even if it meant giving him away for nothing. It is very possible they tried that and no one wanted him for the reasons you mentioned. But, he needs to play regardless. And, it cannot be here. Keeping him as a backup for the sake of it is not good for anyone unless the 67s simply don’t give a damn about the player.
The priority is to ensure MacK get true starter minutes and it seems like they are inching closer to that but not close enough yet. He is currently under 400 minutes played while most other starters in the league are above 550 minutes played with 6 guys well into the 600’s. So, not only are they irresponsibly hindering Donoso but they are also shorting MacK of bonafide starter minutes.
Completely agree with all of these points, the challenge of dealing with OA goalies is that they are either needed in a go for it season or collateral damage in a development year where they are expected to mentor through the process and then watch as their career in the OHL closes out.
As far as Mack's ice time, Ottawa has played the fewest games in the league 11 (660 min. total), playing every minute is unrealistic. He is currently at 60% of the ice time, and I would expect by years end he will be at 65-70% (2,800 min.) which would be consistent with the top goalies in the league most seasons.
Truth be told I think there is a bit of both, selfishness and lack of knowledge. Ottawa doesn't want to give away their back-up goalie, and teams don't like to trade for another teams 2nd best goalie. It doesn't help that he has looked very average himself this year.In a league full of average goalies, the 67’s have two bonafide starters. It is unbelievable to me that either the 67’s are being incredibly selfish or the rest of the league cant see it.
The issue I think in part is that their are not many teams looking to add an overage goaltender. London did and was able to obtain Michael Simpson who was the playoff MVP and Erie traded for Ben Gaudreau who played in the World Juniors. I do not think that fact that he is a backup this season is a factor in no interest as he was the starter on the first overall team in the the OHL last year. It just is the lack of interest in overage goaltenders.Truth be told I think there is a bit of both, selfishness and lack of knowledge. Ottawa doesn't want to give away their back-up goalie, and teams don't like to trade for another teams 2nd best goalie. It doesn't help that he has looked very average himself this year.
He’s 3.19 and .864% so clearly if that was the decision then it was the wrong decision and I will criticize it for the poor decision it was. It was more important, IMO, to give him an opportunity to play as an OA even if it meant giving him away for nothing. It is very possible they tried that and no one wanted him for the reasons you mentioned. But, he needs to play regardless. And, it cannot be here. Keeping him as a backup for the sake of it is not good for anyone unless the 67s simply don’t give a damn about the player.
The priority is to ensure MacK get true starter minutes and it seems like they are inching closer to that but not close enough yet. He is currently under 400 minutes played while most other starters in the league are above 550 minutes played with 6 guys well into the 600’s. So, not only are they irresponsibly hindering Donoso but they are also shorting MacK of bonafide starter minutes.