OMG67
Registered User
- Sep 1, 2013
- 12,850
- 8,563
Boucher and the Sens have options, the 67's will need to operate on the premise that he is not returning until the day that he is returned; it will be whatever the Sens determine is best. Boucher is never going to be an elite scorer, his strengths are along the walls and across the top of the crease, both areas where competition against men would be beneficial... a lot will come down to maturity and where they assess his confidence as being right now.
The return on Sawyer was good, better than I would have expected, and should make things easier to navigate on D now:
Mayich-Matier
Sirman-Costantini
Smyth-Gill-shane
Mews-Ewles
Marelli (Jr.A)
I still question the need for Costantini, move Gill-shane to the 2nd line and Ewles into the 3rd puts Mews and Marrelli in the 7&8 spots where they belong. But smarter minds than I will determine this.
On forward they will need to figure out how to establish a 1st & 2nd line that can hold their own against the other top lines in the league, especially without Boucher.
Beck-Tolnai-Rohrer
Johnston-Pinelli-Stonehouse
Gerrior-Gardiner-Barlas
Quick-Foster-Dever/Kelly
The first line has to be strong enough to keep teams honest, if a team thinks they can get away with their 2nd or 3rd holding against them the mismatches against the third/fourth line will be significant. I really don't think forcing a D to try to fit into the forward group is a good idea right now, it's a Band-Aid to keep a D player happy but impacts the unity up front. They need to build confidence in the forward group, if they are testing the waters with Quick, Foster and Dever then they need to allow them to make a few mistakes, pushing Sirman up only second guesses their abilities.
I should add one thing on Boucher, he has an NHL level shot so scoring goals will come in the right situation.
BOUCHER:
He’s coming back to the 67’s. It is only a matter of when. He was a high pick. If he were to be sent to Belleville, he’d be developed as a 3rd line checker. He simply has not had anywhere near enough ice time over the last two seasons and desperately needs the time to develop his play around the puck. I think the Senators have been pretty clear about their plans for him. It would be a shock if he were sent to Belleville. They can’t take a 10th overall pick as a 19 yea fold and send him to a league he isn’t prepared to properly compete in from an offensive perspective. The Sens aren’t that stupid, nor are they that impatient.
Regarding the lineup, to me it comes down to one single player at this point. BRAD GARDINER. Can he nail down the third centre spot? If he can, I think they will be relatively fine leading up to the deadline. I think most agree that Rohrer and Tolnai will man the top two centre spots. I like Rohrer on the wing more than centre and would clearly welcome the addition of a top flight centre to relagate him to the wing but until that happens, it is unlikely we will see Rohrer as a winger.
Stonehouse and Gardiner played really well together late in the pre-season. TJ and Tolnai played really well together late in the pre-season. I assume those two pairings will remain the same to at least start the regular season. If that holds true, then you have to think Rohrer and Beck will start together as a pairing. Then it is a matter of how the rest of the wingers line up beside them and who fills out the 4th line.
I agree about Costantini but only to a point. He is better than whomever is replacing him. I think the team needs to first ensure they have an equal level player internally before they can even consider entertaining his departure. I like what I’ve seen from Ewles. Is he as good as Costantini is right now? No. Could he be as good as him if he played everyday leading up to the playoffs? Maybe. I could understand that argument but I think we need to see him play for a good month before we can confidently say his ceiling can be reached by end of season and the team is better with him as opposed to Costantini.
a lot of the decisions are going to be based on whether this team is in a position to compete now. IF it is, they need to keep the team as strong as possible. The negative side of that is you lose out on player development for the younger guys but that is the tradeoff. That means guys like Marrelli and Mews play less.
I think there were some good ideas about what was happening with Kasper and as is the case in hockey, just when you think you have it figured out; It Changes. I expect Boucher to return, this team will still have some maneuvering to do one way or the other.
Yeah. The Kasper thing hurts. I believe the Sens would have picked him had they still owned the pick but Debrincat was added and I think that plan floated away with it.