sirius67fan
Registered User
- Jul 20, 2013
- 3,575
- 1,062
Again agree with your logic except for one statement that this team will not be good next year. As i put together a few days ago assuming no players are moved out next year as rumoured.There will always be an element of ”keeping up with the Jones.’” So, the 67’s do need to consider what other teams have done and measure themselves against that. Obviously they can’t change their style of play because their roster foundation doesn’t permit it but they can add pieces like you are saying to get to a point where they can be competitive against the bigger teams like North Bay.
You and I are similar in philosophy. We don’t necessarily agree about the defence. I agree to a point but I temper my expectations while placing a greater emphasis on depth down the middle. I view adding a LD as more of a luxury than a necessity. There are diminishing returns on adding a LD as well. It pushes one of your existing LD off the roster and into the stands so the addition can net out to be marginal. In my mind, unless it is an elite D-Man like Mintyukov, the 67’s would only be marginally upgrading. Pushing a kid like Sirman off the roster compared to pushing a kid like Dever off the roster at forward is a huge difference.
The 67’s recent record is somewhat whitewashed because of illness and roster deletions. I know all teams go through patches of illness but this particular roster needs to be darned near full and healthy to be effective based on the way they play. So, to me, the real question is whether it is realistic for this team to be healthy enough to play the heavy puck pursuit game they excel at or not? That is what it comes down to. IF this team is healthy and chasing the puck with the gusto they have done so, they can win. If they are banged up and not healthy and unable to chase the puck with gusto and pressure the opposition by limiting their time and space then they will lose. They cannot win games grinding it out. That is just a fact.
So, can deepening this team through four lines and hedging against injury by adding additional players be enough? This 67’s team will not beat North Bay no matter which players they add if they aren’t able to limit time and space. They aren’t near big enough and they cannot trade to get near big enough to grind out wins.
If the 67’s pretty much stand pat and only add one OA, I will be disappointed. It won’t be enough. It may get us to the Conference Finals which is good but it is not like we are protecting a future. The team next year doesn’t project as good and if we look two years out we can make a couple moves next season to reset. I find being perpetually good frustrating. Watching Kilrea lose in the finals so many times in the late 90’s and early 00’s while taking the same philosophy of running with what you have is just dumb and unfulfilling. Not just to the fans but also the players in your room. Four Finals losses to One Finals win over a 10 year period is frustrating to say the least. I don’t want to see that garbage again.
Pinelli/Rohrer/Stonehouse
Foster/Gardiner/Gerrior
Barlas/Dever/Kelly
Quick
Mayich/Mews
SmythEwles
Sirman/Marelli
Donoso
Mckenzie
Now add in an import, one or two OA's , further development ( a pattern with this team) and that's not even factoring in a Beck return which is 50/50 now imo. Look we won't be as strong as this year, that's two years from now. But I'll predict right now we'll be top 4 in the east.