HUSH10
Registered User
- Sep 16, 2019
- 1,063
- 602
Let's think "logically" not factually. Remember that.let’s see who is right
Let's think "logically" not factually. Remember that.let’s see who is right
Personally, I like Barlow but I don’t see a big gap between any of Barlow, Romani, Pinelli, and Misa from an impact point of view. Some different attributes amongst them but all are productive.
You also have to take into consideration the likelihood of the player returning as an OA.
Winnipeg isn’t going to let their 1st round pick spend another season in junior hockey next year.
Porky Pinelli isn’t nearly as good as Barlow, but as a 4th round pick there’s a much higher chance of him being sent back to junior for his OA season.
Pinelli is also very short at only 5’9” so that also works against him turning pro as a 20yr old.
Delisle is definitely worth more than that
He is an 07. He was a 3rd round pick. He had 18 points this season in a middle 6 role.I don’t think Delisle has shown enough to warrant a 2nd round pick. It is probably a little early but at the same time, you have to equate his value now. I think a 3rd and 4th is close. He could very well improve his standing in his 17 year old season but, again, when you talk about players at this age, it reverts back closer to where they were picked unless there was a development jump. He was a 3rd round pick. HE had a decent year but nothing special. He doesn’t have size that jumps out. I’m not sure what the picks package would be but the 3rd and 4th is definitely not far off.
I don’t think Delisle has shown enough to warrant a 2nd round pick. It is probably a little early but at the same time, you have to equate his value now. I think a 3rd and 4th is close. He could very well improve his standing in his 17 year old season but, again, when you talk about players at this age, it reverts back closer to where they were picked unless there was a development jump. He was a 3rd round pick. HE had a decent year but nothing special. He doesn’t have size that jumps out. I’m not sure what the picks package would be but the 3rd and 4th is definitely not far off.
Delisle is definitely worth more than that
I agree. I would love him on the Fronts. 3 and a 4 is nothing for a guy like that. If gens don’t win the championship they’ll be regretting that for a few years for sure.Agree 100% - - not sure why others aren’t able to see the value in a 17yr old middle six forward position who plays a two-way game and will be around for the next three years guaranteed, maybe even four years.
As I explained previously, I’d GLADLY give up a 3rd and a 4th for a player like that.
I agree. I would love him on the Fronts. 3 and a 4 is nothing for a guy like that. If gens don’t win the championship they’ll be regretting that for a few years for sure.
But is it....logical?
as I posted weeks ago. 06 d, 07 f, 2nds, 2 3rds and other picks
as I posted weeks ago. 06 d, 07 f, 2nds, 2 3rds and other picks
Wasn’t me, he’s a moron. But I’m a grumpy old man and think everyone is awful lolStop giving Ken Campbell source material. Make sure you at least get a couple pops out of it!
Wasn’t me, he’s a moron. But I’m a grumpy old man and think everyone is awful lol
But is it....logical?
I should try to find the post where he said there was no way that the generals would move those two players and picks
and the players 'the gens would not trade' were Griffin and Bedowsky; his stance softened when Griffin was changed to Delisle.In fairness, he didn’t say that. What was said by @OHL4Life was two players plus “x” picks. Another poster, I think @frontsfan67 stated the two players plus all the picks were higher picks (2nds, 3rds, 4ths). @Donnie740 said there was no way the Generals would trade those players and those picks for Barlow. He referred to specific picks and players, not the more general trade components @OHL4Life posted.
It turned out the players were accurate but the picks were not all high picks. There was a 7th and 10th mixed in and I think only two 2nds or something like that. So, @Donnie740 was accurate. It wasn’t two key player and all high picks like predicted.
Sometimes (actually often), the guys that are more insiders know the components but don’t post the specifics, so others speculate the specifics and we discuss/debate what those specifics are. That’s what happened here.
I don’t have any skin in this game but when people pile on a guy for the wrong reason, it isn’t fair to that poster. There may be other reasons to object to this poster (he can be a little rough around the edges) but in fairness, this shouldn’t be one of them.
Everything we've heard is Delisle and Bedkowski. I personally like Delisle more based on rookie performance but Griffin has the higher upside and has had a great camp and pre season so in that sense, I don't see the gens trading Griffin in THIS trade.and the players 'the gens would not trade' were Griffin and Bedowsky; his stance softened when Griffin was changed to Delisle.
If it is indeed Griffin and Bedowsky, the gens over paid imo.
100% I didn’t know what picks or what years lolIn fairness, he didn’t say that. What was said by @OHL4Life was two players plus “x” picks. Another poster, I think @frontsfan67 stated the two players plus all the picks were higher picks (2nds, 3rds, 4ths). @Donnie740 said there was no way the Generals would trade those players and those picks for Barlow. He referred to specific picks and players, not the more general trade components @OHL4Life posted.
It turned out the players were accurate but the picks were not all high picks. There was a 7th and 10th mixed in and I think only two 2nds or something like that. So, @Donnie740 was accurate. It wasn’t two key player and all high picks like predicted.
Sometimes (actually often), the guys that are more insiders know the components but don’t post the specifics, so others speculate the specifics and we discuss/debate what those specifics are. That’s what happened here.
I don’t have any skin in this game but when people pile on a guy for the wrong reason, it isn’t fair to that poster. There may be other reasons to object to this poster (he can be a little rough around the edges) but in fairness, this shouldn’t be one of them.
All depends how he is playing and the market at the time. If he jumps out to a ppg player or near there. They may just keep him- will be cheaper and he’s obviously a big part of the future going forward.I also don't see the gens being done with trades so Griffin could definitely still be on the move come deadline.
Yeah. Lots can change between now and post Christmas break. I just don't think Gens are done. Will definitely look to add a big defenceman since Bedkowski is gone.All depends how he is playing and the market at the time. If he jumps out to a ppg player or near there. They may just keep him- will be cheaper and he’s obviously a big part of the future going forward.
Unless one of the big names gets hurt or doesn’t come back ie- Ritchie, sennecke, Barlow then they may change their stance about griffin and out of desperation trade him for a guy like Romani if made available.
I agree. Maybe their guy would be Andonovski? Griffin would fit Kitchener’s timeline too. But then again- all depends if the gens would be willing to part ways with him. Gibson would be another one especially with how good the Soo’s 07 class is.Yeah. Lots can change between now and post Christmas break. I just don't think Gens are done. Will definitely look to add a big defenceman since Bedkowski is gone.
Konnor Smith?? Would be an OA problem I knowI agree. Maybe their guy would be Andonovski? Griffin would fit Kitchener’s timeline too. But then again- all depends if the gens would be willing to part ways with him. Gibson would be another one especially with how good the Soo’s 07 class is.
100% I didn’t know what picks or what years lol
Just was guessing based on people saying 5/6/7 picks and I guess maybe I overvalued Barlow a bit or undervalued some of the guys I mentioned (delisle and bedkowski) but right after I realized I was probably wrong.
But that’s what guessing does to ya lol. And yes Donnie and I are both just fans so we don’t obviously know the specifics of deals until they become official