Apparently half the team is not « their biggest problem and very serviceable» on this bottom feeding team.
That's nothing new the media have always pushed the narrative that we're not winning because of our best players (a.k.a. Kovalev/Subban is the problem) and that depth doesn't matter and should be by default glamorised.
Dvorak, Gallagher, Evans and Anderson are not terrible bottom 6 players. But none of them are elite as bottom 6 players. They are weak to so so defensively and none of them is very hard to play against except for Gallagher but he's not what he used to be in that regard. Winning a cup is all about how many players in my lienup is better than the guy doing the same job the other side. The more "yes he is better than the guy the other side" you have in your lineup the more chance you have to win a cup.
In 92-93 Mtl won not because Muller was better than Joe Sakic, Pat Lafontaine or Wayne Gretzky. I loved Muller he was a good 1st line center but Mtl won because Guy carbo was hands down the best 3rd line center in the whole league, LeClair as a 2nd line winger was very hard to play against, defense depth was better than the other teams most nights, Roy was the best goalie, ...
Our bottom 6 atm is very vanilla and there's nothing to write home about there. The 4 vets i listed represent 66% of the bottom 6. That's something KH will have to adress maybe not this year but certainly in part starting with the 2025-2026 season. They'll need to be replaced by better player defensively (potential selke canditates) or physical players hard to play against in their physical prime.
I could see Kapanen and or Beck being borderline selke material or at least getting close enough with experience (wont be day 1). I could see Tuch and Xhekaj being hard to play against. We'll have to see how those guys develop but one thing is sure those vets ain't the answer mid and long term.