Value of: Oilers suggested fixes

Sniped90

Registered User
Jul 20, 2010
322
54
Sherwood Park
Canucks don't need another small offensive dman.

Myers 500k retained for Ceci+Turris

vancouver is retaining atleast 1.5m if its that deal. turris is on his last year of the deal and ceci is playing good hockey on the 2nd line so i mean if anything van is adding
 

HarrySPlinkett

Not a film critic
Feb 4, 2010
3,094
2,639
Calgary
The Oilers should start acting like they have the two best players in the world and start trading futures for people who can play with the two best players in the world.

They’ve drafted their own 1st rounder every year since 2006.

I wonder what happened that year.
 

majormajor

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
26,774
32,919
Chiarot for 2nd + 4th + Turris seems like a good deadline deal. Oilers need a player like that.

Rielly Smith is good, though I don't expect Vegas to give him up. And a good 3C is a better target.

Matt Murray is bad. Koskinen is better.

And Tyler Myers isn't good enough. It makes sense for the Oilers to pay to get a defensive upgrade on Barrie, but Myers is not that player. Throw in more and get a really good D.
 

DingDongCharlie

Registered User
Sep 12, 2010
11,690
9,792
Chiarot for 2nd + 4th + Turris seems like a good deadline deal. Oilers need a player like that.

I'd do this but Montreal would still have to retain. Turris isn't enough to off set the cap difference. With 50% retention which would be needed they probably hold out for a 1st, I wouldn't cave though. Maybe up the 4th to a 3rd.

Chiarot $3.5 million with 50% retention to 1.75 for 2nd, 3rd and Turris full hit at 1.6

Nurse - Barrie
Chiarot - Bouchard
Keith - Ceci

That's not bad. Adding a 2nd pairing LD makes a solid difference.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: majormajor

Bouboumaster

Registered User
Jul 4, 2014
10,730
9,166
For Chiarot, it's a 1st at the very least, and it's even more important if we have to pick up your garbage
 

Soundwave

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
74,010
30,118
If I'm giving up a 1st, I probably would want someone that's longer term fixture on the team.
 

General Fanager

Registered User
Feb 2, 2010
12,030
3,739
Chambly, Qc
I'd do this but Montreal would still have to retain. Turris isn't enough to off set the cap difference. With 50% retention which would be needed they probably hold out for a 1st, I wouldn't cave though. Maybe up the 4th to a 3rd.

Chiarot $3.5 million with 50% retention to 1.75 for 2nd, 3rd and Turris full hit at 1.6

Nurse - Barrie
Chiarot - Bouchard
Keith - Ceci

That's not bad. Adding a 2nd pairing LD makes a solid difference.

The Habs can do better than a 2nd and a 3rd, especially if they retain 50%
 

Burnt Biscuits

Registered User
May 2, 2010
9,277
3,408
Canucks don't need another small offensive dman.

Myers 500k retained for Ceci+Turris
I wouldn't do Ceci for Myers at the same money and same term, Ceci has been way better than advertised. Probably our 2nd best d-man at the moment.
 

Qwijibo

Registered User
Dec 1, 2014
3,571
3,561
Montreal can probably get 2 2nds for Chairot without all the dumb conditions. So pass
 

TFHockey

The CEO of 7-8-0
May 16, 2014
7,192
4,562
Edmonton
For Chiarot, it's a 1st at the very least, and it's even more important if we have to pick up your garbage

If you think Chiarot is getting a 1st+ you're going to be very, very disappointed.

Turris at least is paid only $1.65 Million until the end of the season. Not exactly a hardship.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rubikscube

Qwijibo

Registered User
Dec 1, 2014
3,571
3,561
OV would like to say hi .
Not thst I think McDavid will suddenly go off a cliff, but Ovechkin is an outlier and not a good comparison. Very few players have ever performed like he is at this stage in his career, plus Ovechkin has stayed healthy throughout his career. McDavid has already had more , and more serious, injuries than Ovechkin has in his entire time in the NHL
 

TFHockey

The CEO of 7-8-0
May 16, 2014
7,192
4,562
Edmonton
Not thst I think McDavid will suddenly go off a cliff, but Ovechkin is an outlier and not a good comparison. Very few players have ever performed like he is at this stage in his career, plus Ovechkin has stayed healthy throughout his career. McDavid has already had more , and more serious, injuries than Ovechkin has in his entire time in the NHL

that doesn't mean the Oilers should make bad trades and overpay for your player. We see this again and again. "Wasting McDavid" narrative meaning Edmonton should get bent over in deals for players.
 

The Devilish Buffoon

Registered User
Dec 24, 2018
12,702
11,495
Dont think Ottawa makes that deal. Contrary to popular belief, Murray has been Ottawas best performing goalie (and one of the better in the league) since the goalie coach change.

Not saying they wouldnt trade him, just not at 50% retention with 5mil in salary coming back.
 

Qwijibo

Registered User
Dec 1, 2014
3,571
3,561
that doesn't mean the Oilers should make bad trades and overpay for your player. We see this again and again. "Wasting McDavid" narrative meaning Edmonton should get bent over in deals for players.
I never said they should. I was simply saying you cant count on McDavid to perform like OV when he’s the same age. I did t even look at the trade proposal. It’s not relevant to my point.
 

bucks_oil

Registered User
Aug 25, 2005
8,737
5,131
The Oilers should start acting like they have the two best players in the world and start trading futures for people who can play with the two best players in the world.

They’ve drafted their own 1st rounder every year since 2006.

I wonder what happened that year.

Oilers fans agree with you on this, this year.

Last year we still had too many holes in the lineup and too little cap to realistically address at the deadline. Any deadline deal we made would have required shipping out salary which costs more picks. And would have been a minimal short term gain (and probably not enough) for a longer term problem since we'd then have less cheap home-grown talent to insert (or trade) to sustain our competitiveness.

This year is different. We'll have a little flexibility at the deadline and really only 2-3 holes to fill. We need a better 3C, we need a better goalie (although Skinner... wow... what a statement last night) and we need a 2nd pairing LD or high-end 3rd pairing LD.

All of that should cost in the neighborhood of a 1st, a 2nd, and a 3rd plus a B+ prospect or two. That's totally doable.

By contrast, last year we needed: a better goalie, a #1LW, a #3 LW, a #3C, a #2LD... that's 5 assets and any move required us to ship out salary which meant the acquisition prices were nearly double (since we had to pay extra to shed salary).
 
  • Like
Reactions: TFHockey

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,781
27,844
East Coast
A 2nd and 4th for Chiarot will be trumped by other teams at the deadline. Offer two 2nd's today and we might make that move. A 1st? I'm not sure about that. Not impossible but it will require 4 or 5 teams in on Chiarot and one of them to make the aggressive move.

I can see about 5-10 teams making a 2nd and 4th offer for Chiarot. Lets face it, there is more than the Oilers who would like to add that big boy who has solid skating and raises his game in the playoffs.
 

Gabe Kupari

Registered User
Jul 11, 2013
15,269
14,861
Winter is Coming
Lol @ chiarot for a 1st

Man... turns out being dead wrong about how good your team is all off season makes you overvalue players even more when the team absolutely sucks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: spaghtti

Habs10025

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
3,607
970
If Chiarot is traded it will be to a contending team.

New York Islanders
B. Chiarot

Montreal Canadiens
2nd rd pick - 2022
 
Last edited:

TFHockey

The CEO of 7-8-0
May 16, 2014
7,192
4,562
Edmonton
A 2nd and 4th for Chiarot will be trumped by other teams at the deadline. Offer two 2nd's today and we might make that move. A 1st? I'm not sure about that. Not impossible but it will require 4 or 5 teams in on Chiarot and one of them to make the aggressive move.

I can see about 5-10 teams making a 2nd and 4th offer for Chiarot. Lets face it, there is more than the Oilers who would like to add that big boy who has solid skating and raises his game in the playoffs.

I think you're overvaluing your guys, but I also know that GMs overpay at the deadline all the time. So maybe you're right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DingDongCharlie

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,781
27,844
East Coast
I think you're overvaluing your guys, but I also know that GMs overpay at the deadline all the time. So maybe you're right?

I don't believe so and you say "your guys". We are talking about Chiarot alone in this conversation and you have this seed in your head that you think all Habs fans overvalue all our assets. It's a shitty narrative to use cause all fan bases does this. Even the Oilers fan base bud!

Book mark it. Chiarot will return more than a 2nd and a 4th. Why? Cause of supply/demand and the Oilers are not the only team that will be in on Chiarot.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad