MrHeiskanen
Registered User
- Nov 12, 2017
- 13,009
- 10,596
Katz is plenty of things but a terrible businessman ain't one of them.
He just negotiated a poor business deal, is crying about it, and suing. Is this strong business acumen?
Katz is plenty of things but a terrible businessman ain't one of them.
Not how life or business works. Katz is a scumbag based on his advances and payouts of those actresses, but as far as contracts go, you're a shitty business person if you pay people that possibly broke contracts just to make them go away. And you won't keep your net worth very long opening yourself up to anyone who thinks you're an easy mark.Right or wrong regarding the contractual agreement, courts will decide but regardless youd think that a 4.4 billion dollar person would have more compassion for a homeless shelther, when its only costing him 5 million.
If it is proven that the goal was $8.5m and they actually raised $7.3M, 86% of the goal without any government support, I will rescind my earlier post and agree that Katz is “just another rich asshole”. Not all rich people are the assholes that many people want to make them out to be, just because they are envious of their success.Boyle Street also defended its fundraising efforts — stating that during the campaign it reached out to thousands of supporters, major donors, politicians and ran ad campaigns — raising more than $7.3 million by the end of 2022 from 171 private donors, and additional funds since.
Sounds like they did do their job, 7.3 out of 8.5 million required. Now poor boy Katz can't pony up his promise.
I mean, even if he still has to fork over an additional 5 million he got a prime piece of downtown real estate that when redeveloped will be worth easily 10 times as much.He just negotiated a poor business deal, is crying about it, and suing. Is this strong business acumen?
Sounds like something most billionaires would do... not shelters for the homeless.Sounds like they're gaming the deal.
Fall $1m short, get the extra $5m from Katz and net $4m more from the deal than you were supposed to...how convenient.
You're a horrible person and you should know thatSounds like they're gaming the deal.
Fall $1m short, get the extra $5m from Katz and net $4m more from the deal than you were supposed to...how convenient.
I mean, even if he still has to fork over an additional 5 million he got a prime piece of downtown real estate that when redeveloped will be worth easily 10 times as much.
He bought the Oilers for 145 million in 2007, they are now worth about 1.2 billion.
Developed Rexall Pharmacy and sold it for 3 billion in 2016.
Yeah he's a pretty good businessman.
Sure, but Katz doesn’t have to sue them over this. It’s not even worth the negative publicity never mind the ethics. Other owners would have just moved onSounds to me like the agency breached the contract. Was offered consideration on more than one occasion, and likely doesn't have the business acumen or wherewithal to meet their obligations. Not surprising from a non profit.
The Oilers went from one of the least valuable franchises in 2007 to being the 7th most valuable currently. Essentially equal in value to Chicago, while being in one of the smaller NHL markets. Biggest factor in the value increase is the new Arena they play in, and Katz was instrumental in that deal being negotiated.Sports franchises just naturally go up, there is really no business acumen there that he contributed something so ground breaking for the value to go up. It just happened, based on the league, based on the market, based on a lot of factors all of which have basically nothing to do with Katz.
Rexall would be his biggest success for sure, something tangible that he built, expanded, lead, and sold.
Bad look, bruhOf course he doesn't want to give away 5 million dollars. That will cut into his monthly nose candy budget.
I work for a different billionaire and didn’t get any Christmas bonus despite drastically exceeding revenue and profit expectations. Instead they just raised the targets.I’d also sue those lazy homeless for not doing enough to deserve 0.114 % of my net worth
The whole deal was to facilitate getting the land and OEG structured it in a way that they would have the legal recourse they are now using in the event of having to make this payment. It’s actually really smart as they got what they wanted when originally Boyle street was holding out for a massive overpay on the building because they knew OEG had to have it as part of the later stages of the Ice District development.Then Katz should have negotiated a different deal if he wanted a different outcome? Terrible businessman I guess.
Also, read the article,
if they hit 8.5, he gives 5
if they hit 10.5 he gives 3
if they hit 13.5 he gives nothing
So if they were gaming the system, 8.5 was where they wanted to be.
We aren't talking about 9-5ers, we are talking about people with so much money they can buy sports teams and lobby the government to give them money to build stadiums for them.
For the record I am one of those weirdos who is okay with my taxes being raised if that means better services for people like the unhoused or poor. Wild, I know.
The whole deal was to facilitate getting the land and OEG structured it in a way that they would have the legal recourse they are now using in the event of having to make this payment. It’s actually really smart as they got what they wanted when originally Boyle street was holding out for a massive overpay on the building because they knew OEG had to have it as part of the later stages of the Ice District development.
They’ll settle because Boyle street is likely in some sort of breach of contract and both sides know it. They don’t have to resources for a court battle with OEG, take what you can get and move on.
He just negotiated a poor business deal, is crying about it, and suing. Is this strong business acumen?
Yeah, that’s kinda how contracts work. Strange that concept is not understood or just blatantly ignorant.You're moving the goalposts and arguing something I'm not.
I've said nothing about not providing services for unhoused or poor. But if you read the article, he's given them $20million already, with $5million more to cover up whatever they didn't fundraise from their efforts. Bit of a different picture than you're trying to paint.
I'm saying if two parties agree to something and there are X-stipulations that require Y-action to occur, I don't think it's fair to say "well, even though we didn't fufill X-stipulations, you should still carry out Y-actions cause you have soooooo much more money than us"
Taxes have no bearing on this argument either. He's a private entity. Not the government.
Explain how the bloke who owns the Sharks and gave money to the staff at SAP Centre during Covid during the lockdowns is a scumbag?This just in, nhl owners are scumbags
Yikes, taking shots ar someone's health?Of course he doesn't want to give away 5 million dollars. That will cut into his monthly nose candy budget.