Yeah weird choice tbhHe did that when he signed a two year extension.
Yeah weird choice tbhHe did that when he signed a two year extension.
I just think it’s a bit ironic to both criticize and claim the moral high ground while also joking around about sexual harassmentAddress the rest of the post that's not a clear joke?
Or can we not joke about two of the bigger scumbags in the modern game? Do you live in a pretend world where NHL players and team staff are all amazing people who donate millions to animal shelters?
What do you get out of blindly defending two shitbags you don't personally know?
When did I claim the moral high ground? Again, will you address the stuff about McDavid interfering with management last season and what happens if he tries it with Babs and who wins out? Or will you reply with more sniveling?I just think it’s a bit ironic to both criticize and claim the moral high ground while also joking around about sexual harassment
Seems to me like McDavid and Babs are on the same page - they both putting winning first. But if it comes down to it it’s Connor’s team.When did I claim the moral high ground? Again, will you address the stuff about McDavid interfering with management last season and what happens if he tries it with Babs and who wins out? Or will you reply with more sniveling?
Also, what do you get out of blindly defending these two that you don't personally know?
"We need to hire someone to provide us with daily dick jokes!"
"OK, so I have this idea..."
Yea CM97s points got them one game short of the Cup.lol yep that was the management and coaching staff that got 97 to game 7. Nothing to do with Connor putting up 42 points. That’s the most by a player not named Mario or Wayne by the way, and only 5 points back of the greatest playoff run in history.
The guy got Stu Skinner and a Nurse-Ceci pair one goal away. Shut up with this nonsense
Why do you think he has yo "get something" for simply offering his opinion?When did I claim the moral high ground? Again, will you address the stuff about McDavid interfering with management last season and what happens if he tries it with Babs and who wins out? Or will you reply with more sniveling?
Also, what do you get out of blindly defending these two that you don't personally know?
Not a fan of the hire but at least he didn’t bullshit us with the “I’m a changed man!” Nonsense"Unless you’re 100 percent all-in on Mike Babcock, I have no interest in coming in and being the coach,”
That's quite something to hear from an NHL coach. I can't think of another who would ever say something like that at an introductory press conference.
I don't understand what gets out of not knowing either of them personally and defending them despite what has been made public. What's his angle? Is it just blind homerism? He didn't address the more pressing issue and neither have you, which is. What happens and who wins when Babcock wants to shit on a back up goalie and Connor thinks he's invaluable for the locker room?Why do you think he has yo "get something" for simply offering his opinion?
If you're "what if" scenario actually happens ...... I assume we will find out at that time.I don't understand what gets out of not knowing either of them personally and defending them despite what has been made public. What's his angle? Is it just blind homerism? He didn't address the more pressing issue and neither have you, which is. What happens and who wins when Babcock wants to shit on a back up goalie and Connor thinks he's invaluable for the locker room?

Hypothetical? Nobody stepped in to mess with management when they wanted to get rid of Pickard?If you're "what if" scenario actually happens ...... I assume we will find out at that time.
Keep asking people to guess "what happens" if that's your thing. Maybe you will find someone to argue with, over the imagined fall out of the hypothetical scenario you conjured up.
Cheers![]()
you're what if scenario included "a back up goalie , Connor and what happens when when Babcock wants to.....blah blah blah ..... no more comments from on this one - ridiculousHypothetical? Nobody stepped in to mess with management when they wanted to get rid of Pickard?
*Your, back up goalie is Pickard...This literally happened this past season according to the NHL media. It's not hypothetical.you're what if scenario included "a back up goalie , Connor and what happens when when Babcock wants to.....blah blah blah ..... no more comments from on this one - ridiculous
I already told you - Connor winsI don't understand what gets out of not knowing either of them personally and defending them despite what has been made public. What's his angle? Is it just blind homerism? He didn't address the more pressing issue and neither have you, which is. What happens and who wins when Babcock wants to shit on a back up goalie and Connor thinks he's invaluable for the locker room?
Ok cool, then Connor is left without a cup, again, in my opinion.I already told you - Connor wins
McDavid seems more aligned with Babcock than he was with Knoblauch in terms of the importance of winning so I think your forecasting of a shit show is just wishful thinking.Ok cool, then Connor is left without a cup, again, in my opinion.
We’ll just add him to the staff like we did with Coffey this year. Torts + BabsInb4 Daddy Torts is brought in after the deadline.
Don't see Tortorella taking an assistant role.We’ll just add him to the staff like we did with Coffey this year. Torts + Babs
McDavid brought his junior coach in didn't he?McDavid seems more aligned with Babcock than he was with Knoblauch in terms of the importance of winning so I think your forecasting of a shit show is just wishful thinking.