Speculation: Offseason Thread Part IV - Let's Make A Deal

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
your right but if he can use his speed to move the puck up the ice and help just a little bit on the pp than im fine with trading MDZ for a top 6 forward

i don't think speed alone will benefit the PP. MDZ has a natural, uncanny ability to generate offense that no one else on the defense can imagine to do imo.
 
Staal comes back, he comes back with as clean of a slate as Skinner can and as far as the rest of their careers go in terms of injuries, Staal is much stronger and smarter and better in his overall ability to avoid (unnecessary) injuries.
 
'Fluke injuries' or not, the fact is that Staal's missed 63 GP the past 2 seasons while Skinner's missed only 24. Staal is damaged goods compared to Skinner.

I honestly think Carolina would make the trade, and until proven otherwise Staal was far from damaged goods.
 
Staal comes back, he comes back with as clean of a slate as Skinner can and as far as the rest of their careers go in terms of injuries, Staal is much stronger and smarter and better in his overall ability to avoid (unnecessary) injuries.

staal came back and played like 10 mins before being shut down rest of the playoffs.
 
I honestly think Carolina would make the trade, and until proven otherwise Staal was far from damaged goods.

Well they were reportedly looking for a top 4 defensive dman at the draft and got one in Sekera. I think that should hold off the Staal to Carolina trade rumors, but I still expect him to go there as a FA.
 
'Ability to avoid injuries'

Gets shut down after playing 10 mins in a playoff game.

I think it's clear which player is more damaged/injury prone than the other.

That was more Staal just saying he wasn't up to playing at that point. One he heals (by all accounts he will) he's back to being a top 4 shutdown guy
 
That was more Staal just saying he wasn't up to playing at that point. One he heals (by all accounts he will) he's back to being a top 4 shutdown guy

from words out of his mouth, he said his eye will never be 100%.

That's scary as **** tbh.
 
Or he just came back too early?

a lot of speculations, we won't know considering how conservative the Rangers/Torts were about discussing injuries in length. I believe it wasn't reported he was rushed, just speculation.
 
a lot of speculations, we won't know considering how conservative the Rangers/Torts were about discussing injuries in length. I believe it wasn't reported he was rushed, just speculation.

If he wasn't rushed, are you suggesting that he was injured again in the game? :shakehead
 
The injury to Staals eye was a fluke and you cannot even argue it, he said himself his eye is basically at the same level and his previous concussion isn't a problem anymore
 
Would Staal's eye not being 100% be any different than a player not having 20-20 vision? Genuinely curious
 
Staal's eye injury was a freak accident.

Skinner's concussions of a product of him over-working / ragging the puck in the offensive zone, and refusing to pick his spots on how to smartly manage the puck / make moves in the transition game. And there's the fact that being listed at 5'11" puts his head right at upper arm/shoulder height for most NHL dmen.

It's impossible to know how Staal will recover and how potential sight issues could affect his health moving forward. But from a pure standpoint of which injuries are most likely to reoccur moving forward it has to be Skinner's, IMO.
 
I think throwing a visor on will help with Staal's proneness to being hit in the eye with slapshots.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad