JTBF81
Registered User
They could've at least shared with Tampa and traded Morgan Geekie to them as well.Boston just had to make trades to a divisional rival.
They could've at least shared with Tampa and traded Morgan Geekie to them as well.Boston just had to make trades to a divisional rival.
I don't see us as favorites. I see us as 2nd rounder, maybe ECF if we somehow get lines and matchups right. I'll be legitimately surprised if we make the SCF. I think the lack of identity and style for our bottom lines is a problem. The only way it's masked is if Coop somehow gets it right with lines and makes us 3 lines deep. I still think we'll get hammered into oblivion by Florida and have a drag race against Toronto. I don't like our chances against Florida. Toronto is winnable but it's still difficult.I’ll be honest I’m predicting 1st rd exit. Coaching staff to arrogant. Bottom 6 too soft
I get that playoffs are different than regular season hockey, but we've been playing in a way that is more conducive to winning games than we have since our last run to the SCF. We didn't lose to the Leafs or Panthers in the last two years because we weren't physical enough, we lost because we were completely unable to generate offense at 5v5 and couldn't defend the leads we had when we did - we improved on both of those fronts.
I'm not even super concerned about Chaffee, Perbix, etc. we're in a position to actually shelter these players finally, we'll pretty much have Kuch/Point/Guentzel/Cirelli/Hagel/Bjorkstrand/Paul/Gourde on the ice for like 90% of the game which is a position of strength. My biggest worry is that our defense, despite being a lot better this year, is old and slow and could get exposed in these heavy forechecking matchups.
A round one loss is very possible, we're in probably the hardest (2nd after central?) division in the sport, but I think JBB has put us in the best possible position to make a push this season.
edit: for reference regarding physicality, if you sort the top teams by hits in the nhl, only 3 of the top 16 are in a playoff spot
That's probably why Seattle wanted him though. I doubt they said "just throw in a forward."If there is one thing I would be critical of, it's why we'd drop Mikey Eyssimont over Mitchel Chaffee or Gage Goncalves, maybe the coaches couldn't trust his lack of discipline or more selfish play? Either way I think he was far and away the best forward of the 3.
Idk I think Tampa/coaching just didn't see value in him, he was consistently the least played players on the team and one of the few that would get scratched for his mistakesThat's probably why Seattle wanted him though. I doubt they said "just throw in a forward."
Seattle may not have done it for either of the other two. Tampa may not have done it for Chaffee, who is the better player, at least offensively. Ace has a great motor and gets under the opponents skin, no doubt; however, Gourde brings many of the same qualities and with a better offensive skillset.If there is one thing I would be critical of, it's why we'd drop Mikey Eyssimont over Mitchel Chaffee or Gage Goncalves, maybe the coaches couldn't trust his lack of discipline or more selfish play? Either way I think he was far and away the best forward of the 3.
This. Gourde does everything Eyssimont could do but much better. While it would've been nice to have an extra pest, Eyssimont was more of a liability than an asset. Not a needle mover and his tools are subpar. If you're just an energy guy, if someone can do it better, then you're expendable. It just so happens to be Gourde is much better.Seattle may not have done it for either of the other two. Tampa may not have done it for Chaffee, who is the better player, at least offensively. Ace has a great motor and gets under the opponents skin, no doubt; however, Gourde brings many of the same qualities and with a better offensive skillset.
Yeah, in a normal format, Tampa would be facing Carolina and then the winner of the Caps-Sens. The conference semis could have ended up in Florida-Toronto and TB-Was, but it is what is instead, a terrible system.We definitely still have a good chance of getting knocked out in the first round, but that's mostly because of our ridiculous division and playoff format. In another format where we're more likely to get someone like Carolina first I think we'd be far more likely to go deep. That said we should be far less hapless compared to the past two postseasons unless Vasi turns into a pumpkin again.
I think it's a valid concern to question this teams size. Especially at forward.I think if you have any doubts with this team it’s from the recency bias of the last two postseasons. We may very well lose in the first round, winning the cup are always long odds, but this is a championship caliber lineup.
I think it's size in the top 6 that mainly matters though, and we were never that big there. I don't think Pat Maroon playing 10 minutes per night made us bigger (although I would have loved to have him back).I think it's a valid concern to question this teams size. Especially at forward.
That's the only thing that makes me question if we really are a championship team.I think it's a valid concern to question this teams size. Especially at forward.
I think it's a valid concern to question this teams size. Especially at forward.
No, just the one he did after the Gourde and Bjorkstrand trade.Just for clarification, JBB didn't do any media post-deadline, did he?
So you see us as ECF (need to beat TOR and FL) but the SCF will surprise you (need to beat the metro team)I see us as 2nd rounder, maybe ECF if we somehow get lines and matchups right. I'll be legitimately surprised if we make the SCF.
We definitely still have a good chance of getting knocked out in the first round, but that's mostly because of our ridiculous division and playoff format. In another format where we're more likely to get someone like Carolina first I think we'd be far more likely to go deep. That said we should be far less hapless compared to the past two postseasons unless Vasi turns into a pumpkin again.