Richardson fits IMO. Burrows not so much. Replace Burrows with a vet coach and it might come together well. I also don't know much about Letowski
Ideally I'd like
Coach
----------
Knows everything in hockey, strong leadership, strong communicator ( ST-Louis fits the bill ). Can do everything well.
ACoach 1
-----------
X and O's guy with opinions ( best X and O's guy you could find in the business )
ACoach 2
------------
The best player's performance reader you could find. The type of guy that will automatically know if a player is in his game or out of it and won't be scared to tell the coach about it. Would also be the coach that would help the coach the most for the line changes. ( Richardson could be that, he seems to do a fine job at that, but is he the best for that kind of role, I'm not sure )
ACoach 3
------------
I'd like the best psychologist possible. Will be able the intervene and help player with the bigger problems on life and be a guy that will help the coach and other assistant coach know where each player are mentally and how to help them being at peak form in their head. ( Maybe that coach does not need to be on the bench but I feel any team should have that kind of guy in permanence surrounding the team )
I'd like us to build a dream team of coaching. I'd like to not only have the best coach in the business but I'd also targets the best Acoach in the business. They are as important if not more than the coach and are often overlooked.
I'm really not sure any of our Assistant Coach fit that bill personally. But I do think that Richardson is the one I'd consider keeping the most because he did a fine job while Ducharme was absent during the playoffs.
We need to gain an edge on the other teams and coaching is a place where we could really well do that. Every inch is important in that kind of sports. We should not be content with ok guys that does the job anywhere in the organisation.