biturbo19
Registered User
- Jul 13, 2010
- 27,239
- 12,384
What does Vancouver need? I’d love to run this lineup:
Kaprizov-Hartman-Zucc
Boldy-Gaudreau (Rossi)-Boeser
Greenway-Eriksson Ek-Foligno
Is it defense? Minnesota has a lot of defensive prospects, but basically none are RHD outside of Addison and I don’t see him being offered when he has made the power play so much better than it was in years past.
Really, what Vancouver needs is a steady, defensive defenceman with some size. And a RHD. Obviously there isn't a fit there.
But they basically don't have any defensive prospects of note, so i wouldn't even be too picky about that. Especially if they're potentially years down the line.
Someone like Addison, i get why Minnesota wouldn't want to offer him, and honestly he's not at all what the Canucks need anyway. So that's easy enough.
The other big thing the Canucks need, is flexibility under the cap. They've just got way too much money committed to Wingers, and particularly offensive-oriented ones. They need to re-allocate some of that toward other priorities. Including an impending ENORMOUS Horvat extension.
You just can't have as much money as they do, committed to:
Boeser.
Miller.
Garland.
Mikheyev.
Pearson.
Kuzmenko (who is going to be due a significant extension).
And then have your young guys also wingers like:
Podkolzin.
Hoglander.
Lekkerimaki.
It's just too much.
But given Minnesota's cap situation with the Parise/Suter buyouts, i'm not sure they're in a position to really alleviate that pressure.
But finding a way to reallocate Boeser's money somewhere else, goes a long ways to fixing the "balance" of the Canucks roster. Honestly, just re-allocating some of the money to a more dedicated bottom-6 banger would still help. Slot the roster together better in the meantime, and gain some sort of futures asset (to flip for the defence fix). That'd be just fine.