Dickey is 38, only play 3 full season in MLB and prior to this season showed nothing--giving him a huge contract is a bad idea
this is how i feel aswell.
Dickey is 38, only play 3 full season in MLB and prior to this season showed nothing--giving him a huge contract is a bad idea
Why are you laughing? It's true. Multiple people, myself included, have explained why.
Why are you laughing? It's true. Multiple people, myself included, have explained why.
Why the hell would the Jays trade Rasmus if they want to win now? They're clearly loading up on established MLB players. Rasmus is a more complete MLB player right now and there's no reason to give up on him yet, as has been said.
I'm laughing at the great length that this guy has gone to discredit Colby Rasmus. The point is we have BOTH Gose and Rasmus and it makes no sense to trade either one at this time until Gose steals Colby's job. He wants to hand him the reigns to Centre field right now.
And regards to JPA I will admit I have a soft spot for him because he seems like a good clubhouse guy. Ultimately clubhouse chemistry is important and I think he plays a role in this. For as much as baseball can be reduced to a numbers game, you always have to remember the human element
Read this when you have the time:
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/r-a-dickey-and-the-myth-of-one-great-year/
I'm laughing at the great length that this guy has gone to discredit Colby Rasmus. The point is we have BOTH Gose and Rasmus and it makes no sense to trade either one at this time until Gose steals Colby's job. He wants to hand him the reigns to Centre field right now.
And regards to JPA I will admit I have a soft spot for him because he seems like a good clubhouse guy. Ultimately clubhouse chemistry is important and I think he plays a role in this. For as much as baseball can be reduced to a numbers game, you always have to remember the human element
Remember how people were mocking Royals for what they gave up for Shields. Yeah, that's us now.
Don't get me wrong, Dickey has been very good for the past three years, he just hasn't been David Price. I disagree with those saying he's a one year wonder, a he most certainly is not and anyone who says he is have absolutely no idea what they're talking about. At the same time, Price has been better over the past three years.
Are they comparable? I suppose, but there's no way you could logically argue that Dickey has been just as good or better.
Well then you are both wrong..
It should also be noted that every blog or tweet that mentions the trade being TDA, Syndergaard etc. says "according to the New York Post"... meaning it's that one beat writers word being taken for all of it. That's not to say it's not true, but nobody in Toronto has leaked anything and everyone agrees that's a lot to give up... especially when AA went from no TDA at all to TDA++
Maybe it's not my place to step in, but how can you just say they're wrong on an opinion over giving him a big extension?![]()
Remember how people were mocking Royals for what they gave up for Shields. Yeah, that's us now.
Because he "only had 1 good year"?
Well then you are both wrong..
Remember how people were mocking Royals for what they gave up for Shields. Yeah, that's us now.