Erndog
Registered User
- Jul 17, 2007
- 4,099
- 1,543
the smoak deal was literally throwing money out the window.
Yeah, I remember how baffled I was when I heard that. Did one of those double takes. Couldnt wrap my head around it.
the smoak deal was literally throwing money out the window.
The Smoak deal is only an issue if management is seriously using it as a reason to not go after guys, which I don't think is the case at all.
EE's agent misjudged the market, not Atkins/Shapiro.
I COMPLETELY disagree with those of you saying that the front office jumped the gun with morales.
Morales is a fine replacement for either/both of EE/JB and if he would have slipped out of their grasp this forum would be going NUTS that we have done absolutely **** all to improve the team.
I think the FO had to have known that they were not bringing back both of EE/JB and targeted morales right from the get go as a quality player available at a reasonable rate and moved quickly to lock him up.
Morales is definitely not holding them back from signing EE or JB if they want too, if anything it gives them more leverage in negotiations because they already have a replacement player ready.
Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised to see both EE/JB come back. EE on a good deal around whats being proposed (4x20ish), and JB on a 1 year deal.
Add (some of) that dead money to the Fowler offer, and maybe he's a Blue Jay.
Obviously they aren't going to come out and say that contract is the reason they miss out on guys, because it would highlight how stupid the contract was.
There was a quote a week ago by management on "getting younger" lol that really hasn't happened yet. Jays were apparently the oldest team last year.
This is one of my biggest fears with this FO - they don't realize how hard it usually is to get free agents to come here.
For a long while toronto simply wasn't a consideration for top free agents, aside from a Cano-to-SEA overpay.
Now they actually have top free agents giving them the time of day and willing to sign for market par or less and they're not understanding that that won't last.
I don't think signing a 30 year old relief pitcher to bat 4th is a good idea
In seriousness, I am down for Melky, but I don't think Shapiro and Atkins want to trade for two outfielders, so I think we'd have to go sign Revere or work with Upton/Carrera/Pompey to replace Cain in that lineup
EE's agent misjudged the market, not Atkins/Shapiro.
So would you have pushed the deal to $92.5 million if you needed to?
If Pompey, Ramirez, Smith Jr, Rowdy, and Lourdes all see time...which I venture to bet each one will to varying degrees, they most certainly will have gotten younger. Not sure how you people think getting younger works? Signing 31 year olds, I imagine.
but aren't they removing time for the kids by signing a bunch of old vets for depth roles, instead of just signing a couple expensive vets for the top of the lineup and leaving room for the kids in depth roles?
how they treated EE last offseason can't be left out, though.
they decided to go with an "All Business, No relationship" approach from the start with EE and Jose, so can't be blameless for them returning that favor now.
but aren't they removing time for the kids by signing a bunch of old vets for depth roles, instead of just signing a couple expensive vets for the top of the lineup and leaving room for the kids in depth roles?
There was a quote a week ago by management on "getting younger" lol that really hasn't happened yet. Jays were apparently the oldest team last year.
the smoak deal was literally throwing money out the window.