Gallant has the team playing the same system that Quinn employed, just a simplified version of it. But its different than any Gallant has played in the past (which all relied on aggressive neutral zone play) and as far as I can tell is different than any other system being used in the NHL today.
There are really only two types of systems teams play: one that involves pressure in the offensive zone via a heavy forecheck or one that involves pressure in the neutral zone with trapping. Its literally the two sides of the hockey systems coin. We do... neither. We have a light forecheck and passive and retreatist neutral zone play.
Why are they ignoring the neutral zone and their own blue line? It is definitely by design so a maybe a willingness to cede sustained defensive zone time to accomplish its goal of avoiding on avoiding odd-man rushes? I have no idea. But the end result is the Rangers getting absolutely crushed with shots and chances nightly.
Why did Gallant stick with this system? The Rangers were pretty average defensively last year (and actually above average in terms of GF if not anything else) so maybe Gallant figured he could make it work? And we've been winning games, despite often being out shot and out chanced by huge margins, so he'd rather not rock the boat? Again, I have no idea.
All I know is that right now is that even the Rangers star players are pedestrian at 5v5. When Panarin and Fox, two of the leagues best, are out on the ice together they are being out shot 125-103. But its a personnel problem?
Your view is that Gallant used to know how to coach, but somehow he's forgotten and is now an idiot. Is that logical?
How many coaches have to pass through until it becomes crystal clear that the issues are not about coaching?
It's baffling to me that anyone believes that coaches go from smart to stupid when they switch teams. The only variable in the equation that changed is who is playing for the coaches.
Kakko can go 20 games without a goal while in the top 6. That's unbelievably pitiful. Cup contenders don't have those situations.
I still think Laf will be okay, but he's a huge disappointment, so far.
Chytil hasn't improved enough.
Gauthier crashes into goalies and that's about it.
Hunt in a top-6 spot?
The fourth line can get pinned in for entire shifts. The third line is weak.
The depth on this team is horrible. Their D is improving and will be fine. The forwards need help.
They do have arguably the best goalie and defenseman in the league and very good special teams so they are much higher in the standings than anyone thought could happen. Why be upset about a team that is overachieving?
The fault lies with management and the bad luck of management that two high draft picks haven't worked out, yet.
Yes, it's a personnel problem.