Confirmed with Link: NYR/VAN: Carson Soucy for 3rd Round Pick from VGK trade

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
He was a microstat darling for one season in. 22-23. Every other season has been bad to terrible. Really bad at exiting the defensive zone. Bad in the offensive zone. Good at defending the blue line. I saw more promising data from Borgen before he was acquired.

All I want is the answer to one question. If he is so bad, why are the GA with him on the ice consistently very low? For reference, since the start of his career, among dmen with 590+ mins played in each season here is how he ranks in GA (most recent season first):

  1. 85 / 183
  2. 13 / 203
  3. 20 / 198
  4. 103 / 198
  5. 7 / 159
  6. 6 / 179

Season 1 is with a tandem of Stalock/Dubnyk (~.900 save percentage)
Season 2 is with Talbot/Kahkonen
Seasons 3 and 4 there are with .890 save percentage Grubauer as his starting goalie.
Last year mostly Demko and this year Lankinen.

Not like he's been playing behind Vezina winners. So why is this the case? Is he lucky every year and randomly gets great goaltending when he's on the ice? Is he only used against 3rd and 4th liners? But if that's so (and I'm told QoC is not that important) how come there aren't many dmen with that kind of usage that put up those results?

Is it more likely that he's been lucky 6 years straight (4 of which were top 20 seasons) or that defensive stats/models are really not all that great at this point in time?
 


Captain Miller getting his players on the team.

1000007634.gif
 
A low price considering scarcity of defensemen available and the usual trade deadline premium. I'm curious about any past Borgen and Soucy have together, even if they weren't a permanent pair. Don't know, don't remember.

The draft pick being acquired and flipped makes me wonder if there's a defenseman being flipped (de Haan?) or if Jones is earmarked for a trade soon. I don't see a clear vision of Drury's intended depth chart yet.
Could of picked one up off waivers that was just as bad as Soucy for free
 
  • Like
Reactions: mas0764
Rest of this season, my best guess, without another defenseman traded is...

With Fox in the lineup (and I'm also guessing he comes back not 100 percent recovered):
Miller-Fox
Soucy-Borgen
Vaakanainen-Schneider

But that leaves de Haan as 7/8 and Jones "rotting away" again until he's up for renewal as an RFA in the offseason.

So that's strange.

Without Fox in the lineup:

Miller-Borgen
Vaakanainen-Schneider
de Haan/Jones-Soucy

Jones gets more time if/when the Rangers are out of playoff contention, otherwise they'll choose the veteran.

Seems simpler if someone is on the way out.
 
How many of you have actually watched him play extensively?

Yeah, that’s what I thought.

Soucy is a 4-5 defenseman with some bite. This is far and away been his worst season. Worth the dice roll and with a year to run, he gives Drury some inventory under contract that could facilitate other moves.nothing to get too excited or distressed about.
 
How many of you have actually watched him play extensively?

Yeah, that’s what I thought.

Soucy is a 4-5 defenseman with some bite. This is far and away been his worst season. Worth the dice roll and with a year to run, he gives Drury some inventory under contract that could facilitate other moves.nothing to get too excited or distressed about.
Have watched pretty much every Canucks game this year, thanks for asking.
 
All I want is the answer to one question. If he is so bad, why are the GA with him on the ice consistently very low? For reference, since the start of his career, among dmen with 590+ mins played in each season here is how he ranks in GA (most recent season first):

  1. 85 / 183
  2. 13 / 203
  3. 20 / 198
  4. 103 / 198
  5. 7 / 159
  6. 6 / 179

Season 1 is with a tandem of Stalock/Dubnyk (~.900 save percentage)
Season 2 is with Talbot/Kahkonen
Seasons 3 and 4 there are with .890 save percentage Grubauer as his starting goalie.
Last year mostly Demko and this year Lankinen.

Not like he's been playing behind Vezina winners. So why is this the case? Is he lucky every year and randomly gets great goaltending when he's on the ice? Is he only used against 3rd and 4th liners? But if that's so (and I'm told QoC is not that important) how come there aren't many dmen with that kind of usage that put up those results?

Is it more likely that he's been lucky 6 years straight (4 of which were top 20 seasons) or that defensive stats/models are really not all that great at this point in time?
I have no idea why, maybe there’s something unique about him defensively that can’t be quantified by the numbers we have. On the other hand he’s terrible offensively to the point where his relGF% has been in the toilet with Vancouver. Am I supposed to celebrate that this is the guy who is likely going to be Fox’s partner the rest of this season and next season? Another defenseman who is completely deficient in transition and in the offensive zone playing on the top pair? You could make the same argument for Lindgren that you are making for Soucy and Lindgren was actually plying top pairing minutes. Up until this season Lindgren’s numbers were just as good defensively in both GA/60 and xGA/60. Ironically both are having terrible seasons this year. Actually Lindgren is having a much better season defensively according to xGA/60 relative to teammates. Why didn’t we just keep Lindgren?
 

Ad

Ad