Kennerback
Registered User
- Jun 2, 2021
- 4,892
- 7,611
I love the pickup. He’ll score goals or completely bust. No in-between. High reward. No risk.
More or less, he was shanking some opportunities, but as a whole, even pedestrian shots didn't generate rebounds or create a scoring chance. At least that's my memory and perception.I think what you are saying is that he missed all the time last season v. not getting quality shots. If so, this is 100% what happened. His best attribute is his shot and he just began shanking every good opportunity. Stick starts to be gripped too tightly, he gets in his own head etc.
Funny thing is that he still found his way to be in a position to miss a good opportunity whereas many Kings players can't even get a chance to miss a good opportunity.
Toffoli put together a worse season in 2019 than Kaliyev ever has. Career worst shooting percentage on a total shot amount that is still one of the highest of his career. He gets more rope than Kaliyev since he's proven it before, but Kaliyev's 2024 reminded me of Toffoli's 2019. The difference, amongst other things, is that Toffoli is a good locker room guy whereas Kaliyev just doesn't seem to fit in.
I love AK's skillset. At worse, he is a 20 goal guy on a lottery team. The skill is NHL contract worthy and I hope he turns it around but I do feel he is destined to play overseas.
They are to late Blake and the Kings have already done that.they just want to ruin his development like kakko
LA gave up Kaliyev for nothing in order to not risk losing nearly 38-year-old Trevor Lewis or 8th d-man Kyle Burroughs.
So you showcase him on a contract year as 12th 13th forward that scores a few on a 2nd PP unit and you trade him at the deadline. When you prefer icing 11 players and not give any chance to Kaliyev, despite our awful PP is interesting to me.AK was worth nothing. They tried every avenue to move him for a year, no takers, even teams looking to make the cap floor passed.
More or less, he was shanking some opportunities, but as a whole, even pedestrian shots didn't generate rebounds or create a scoring chance. At least that's my memory and perception.
So you showcase him on a contract year as 12th 13th forward that scores a few on a 2nd PP unit and you trade him at the deadline. When you prefer icing 11 players and not give any chance to Kaliyev, despite our awful PP is interesting to me.
Burroughs brings nothing but 4minutes of garbage icetime. There's nothing Burroughs brings to the table for the Kings that they don't already have.
The Kings prefer 4 minutes of Burroughs over 4 minutes of Kaliyev.
I know, My point was that they waived him when other players would've cleared easily.AK was worth nothing. They tried every avenue to move him for a year, no takers, even teams looking to make the cap floor passed.
Kaliyev damaged his relationship with the organization last year, nobody is shedding a tear for him in El Segundo today. The bigger fear was nobody putting in a claim and having him malingering around Ontario when he clearly didn't want to put in the work here.I know, My point was that they waived him when other players would've cleared easily.
Burroughs will be waived/dealt the second Doughty is cleared.So you showcase him on a contract year as 12th 13th forward that scores a few on a 2nd PP unit and you trade him at the deadline. When you prefer icing 11 players and not give any chance to Kaliyev, despite our awful PP is interesting to me.
Burroughs brings nothing but 4minutes of garbage icetime. There's nothing Burroughs brings to the table for the Kings that they don't already have.
The Kings prefer 4 minutes of Burroughs over 4 minutes of Kaliyev.
If they wanted him gone, they could've given him away for future considerations at any time, and I don't think that they would've given him a conditioning stint in Ontario if they didn't want him around that team. That suggests to me that they were trying to send him there unconditionally and hoped that he'd clear. They're probably not that heartbroken that he was claimed, considering the circumstances, but I don't think that they wanted to lose him for nothing.Kaliyev damaged his relationship with the organization last year, nobody is shedding a tear for him in El Segundo today. The bigger fear was nobody putting in a claim and having him malingering around Ontario when he clearly didn't want to put in the work here.
just spelled differently, you're getting Kakko 2 yrs agoKakko to Kaliyev is a sweet upgrade
My recollection was that he was getting chances where the puck was going to him and it would excite you that the guy with the killer shot was the one about to receive the puck but then nothing, much like the snakebit Toffoli season I mentioned earlier.More or less, he was shanking some opportunities, but as a whole, even pedestrian shots didn't generate rebounds or create a scoring chance. At least that's my memory and perception.
Six goals and 12 points in the first 20 games. The wheels started to come off the bus for the Kings in Game 24 (12/9/23) on the Island, Kaliyev's 22nd game of the season as he was suspended to start the year for a kneeing penalty, something that put a wrench in Blake's master plan to assemble a roster short one player due to cap constraints. Over the next 15 games Kaliyev played in (was scratched a couple of times), the Kings lost 11 of them with the last three games seeing him get less than nine minutes of ice time, including McClellan's last game.This is pretty much true. His shot became predictable, and goalies knew just where set up . He had 74 shots over the first 3 months in 23'-24'... 6 goals. That's only an 8 pct sp. Dec of 23' was his high with 27 shots.. 1 goal for a 3.7 sp. For a so called sniper that's awful.
Kaliyev fits in. He is slow like the rest of the Rangers.Kakko to Kaliyev is a sweet upgrade
I was curious when looking at that post my mind went. That does not make senseThat tweet was from March 27th, 2023. It is January 6th, 2025.
Honestly, it says a lot about his reputation around the league when so many bottom feeding, offensively starved teams saw him available for free and say, "nah. We're good with Pat Maroon"