Other than his development being stunted for about 2 years, well before AV got here, I agree with you.
Thats also a pretty huge piece of information. Its not like we threw this guy away -- his play has been slipping for quite a while
Frankly, that's revisionist ********. His development was going great ever since the wake up call when Torts sent him to the AHL in his sophomore season. He started taking defense seriously, and followed that up with the best year of his career in his third season. Last year, he continued that pace, right up until he started playing with a sports hernia (an injury that requires surgery and directly impacts skating, which in turn impacts everything a hockey player does). His development has been "stunted" for two years before AV got here? That's just not true. The two years before AV got here were his two best seasons--seasons where he got Norris votes FFS. You are literally just making things up.
Michael.... Is that YOU???!
I wish. I'd love to be a 23 year old millionaire. I don't much like the idea of living in Nashville, though.
It isn't that Del Zotto was more expensive than Moore. It's that he was about to be more expensive than deserved for a 3rd pair defenseman. I'm not saying DZ is a 3rd pair caliber D. I'm saying that's the role he would've been playing for us. There's just no situation where he would have been more than a 3rd pair guy for us, provided Staal and McDonagh stay healthy.
I get you don't like the trade because you think Del Zotto has more upside or could return to form in Nashville, but honestly... it does not matter what Del Zotto does in Nashville. If Klein is a positive contributor to this team for 18-20 minutes a night, the trade is good for us.
Jan Hlavic was a positive contributor to this team, but prime Marc Savard would have been something we desperately needed (a true #1 center). The team's impatience resulted in tossing away a piece that we ultimately needed, for a piece that was "useful" but was ultimately something we could have picked up for free on the UFA market. This team makes trades like that ALL. THE. TIME. It's part of the reason we never make it over the hump. The closest this team got to being competitive came after a sustained number of years of keeping our youth. Ever since the Nash trade, we've been back to the pre-lockout philosophy. That should terrify more people on here (which makes me wonder how many people were actually around for those years. I know there are a lot of younger folks on here).
I'm also wary of Marc Staal. Up until the last ten games or so, he's been a train wreck this season. He is one of my favorite Rangers, but looking at it objectively, he is a fragile NHL player, who is one hit away from his career being over, and has had far more bad games than good ones this season. His offense has completely disappeared, and there is speculation (I don't think it's a sure thing, but it's enough to be concerned about) that he will bolt for Carolina when his contract is up.
Say ANY one of those things happens (regresses due to injury, leaves for Carolina, or career ends via concussion)--look what we have now. A RD set that features Girardi, Stralman, Klein, McI and Allen, and a LD set that features McD...um John Moore, and...uh...yeah. If anything happens to Staal, then we will (thanks to this trade) be in a worse situation than we were before (as Stralman is much better than Moore on the 2nd pairing). A little patience would have resolved our "balance" issue, as we HAVE RD guys close to being NHL ready.
The only way I can sign onto your argument is if I've lived in a cable TV-less hole since May of 2012.
I havent.
On the contrary, the only way you could disagree with my argument is if you ONLY HAD cable TV during the 11 games where John Moore looked like an NHL player after he first arrived from Columbus (playing ridiculously sheltered minutes, btw). If you honestly think there is anything John Moore has done that compares to what MDZ has done, then I don't know what to tell you, because you are so mind-numbingly wrong about that, and anybody with two eyes and a brain can see that.
Here's a thought--base player evaluation on what the player does, not on what people on this internet forum say about him. We had the same issue with Dubinsky in the year that he was the official forum whipping boy. The board was wrong about him, too.