The problem is the defence, not the goaltending.With his current .908 SV% it a boat anchor today....
The problem is the defence, not the goaltending.With his current .908 SV% it a boat anchor today....
"Boat Anchor"
Why spend so much on one goaltender then ?The problem is the defence, not the goaltending.
“You can’t win a cup paying a goaltender too much!” - people who don’t realize how much cap Bobrovsky and Vasilevskiy were taking up when they won the Cup.
No he didn't lmao. Lundqvist was the only Ranger who showed up to that series. His 2 shutouts were the only games they won.How many cups did he get you guys? And brodeur outplayed him in the playoffs when he was like 39 so yea…. miss me with that weak ass shit.
With the league shifting towards even the best goalies starting 50 games a year, no goalie is worth that kind of contract. When you factor in Shesterkin’s age and the Rangers window, it makes it worse.Best player on the team by a long shot but that’s rough. I guess if any goalie is worth that, it’s him.
All do respect, you didn't actually expect them to do that, did you? I don't think many other teams would have.Yes!
My argument would be that the gap between 1 and 35 for goalies is quite small compared to the rank between 1 and 35 for centers.So out of 64 NHL goaltenders at a given moment, you'd say he's ranked somewhere like 30th - 35th?
Your boss comes to you in the morning and says "Hey Jimmy, we can't afford your raise right now because of our salary cap, sorry."The cap is horrible, blaming players for the cap being horrible is dumb
I was surprised how many people replied with comments like that. I couldn't imagine a scenario where a rough 8 game stretch by an entire team would cost their undoubtable MVP $$$.He got 4 million more than those who said he was stupid for turning down 11.
Not in the playoffs.Hank factually owned the devils. Dominated marty specifically
And his save percentage in the playoffs is insane!
I have no problem with the $. It's just the term due to Shesterkin's age.
*regular season gamesWith the league shifting towards even the best goalies starting 50 games a year, no goalie is worth that kind of contract. When you factor in Shesterkin’s age and the Rangers window, it makes it worse.
Narrator: "It won't be."That's a lot for a goalie. Such deals have never been worth it in this league. Let's see if this will be.
$1.5M more than what Bobrovsky signed for 5 years ago. It's not a death sentence to the Rangers at all.
Shisterkin is clearly as good as any other goalie in the league. Just not seeing the rest of the Rangers (especially their core) as equivalent to other top clubs’ cores. Shisterkin will need to be the reason they hang in there with the other top clubs.Florida had their franchise players on contracts the Rangers don’t have
It’s going to be tough to be competive during this contract
Maybe, but the contract itself doesn't really have anything to do with that.Florida had their franchise players on contracts the Rangers don’t have
It’s going to be tough to be competive during this contract