flyerslducks
Registered User
- Feb 15, 2017
- 12,751
- 13,609
Maybe in another universe. But in this one, it’s quite the contraryshouldn't the same guy be equal to himself?
Maybe in another universe. But in this one, it’s quite the contraryshouldn't the same guy be equal to himself?
Georgiev and Strome money will go too. I wouldn’t say re-signing is impossible. I suspect Nemeth gets moved too, but who knows.In a vacuum, price paid for player is good bargain bin hunting.
Unfortunately, it will cost more than McKegg + Hunt $ to extend so unless we win the Cup and he is instrumental, which odds are against, it will be a waste.
Exception would be if Trouba lets us deal him early, but that is also long odds.
very few teams have the space to take a guy on with no salary retention right now. Maybe he's a loyal enough Panther that they just traded a spy into our locker room to feed them back information in case we meet in the playoffs...Somehow this doesn't make sense. Couldn't Florida have found a team in the west, or out of the playoffs to give them a 4th or 5th for Vatrano? You don't trade a roster player for draft picks to a team you may very well see in the playoffs??
Not buying either one.very few teams have the space to take a guy on with no salary retention right now. Maybe he's a loyal enough Panther that they just traded a spy into our locker room to feed them back information in case we meet in the playoffs...
Strategery....
As someone else posted, Rangers had the cap space for the deal and while it would make for a gripping narrative, the chances of Frank Vatrano being the key to the Rangers beating the Panthers in the playoffs is, while not impossible, highly unlikely.Somehow this doesn't make sense. Couldn't Florida have found a team in the west, or out of the playoffs to give them a 4th or 5th for Vatrano? You don't trade a roster player for draft picks to a team you may very well see in the playoffs??
This is history repeating itself if the Leafs acquire Gio. See: Eric BrewerKraken just confirmed that Gio is not playing tonight, despite his 1000th game celebration, good chance he gets moved as well. No way to be sure but Vatrano getting traded right after could be related.
It's not a waste if he helps make us a better team this year, whether we win the cup or not. It's a 4th round pick and it's not even our best 4th round pick. The odds of that pick helping us more in the future than Vatrano will now is slim.In a vacuum, price paid for player is good bargain bin hunting.
Unfortunately, it will cost more than McKegg + Hunt $ to extend so unless we win the Cup and he is instrumental, which odds are against, it will be a waste.
Exception would be if Trouba lets us deal him early, but that is also long odds.
It's not a waste if he helps make us a better team this year, whether we win the cup or not. It's a 4th round pick and it's not even our best 4th round pick. The odds of that pick helping us more in the future than Vatrano will now is slim.
If Vatrano is the reason the Rangers hypothetically beat the Panthers in a playoff series, then Florida had other problems.Somehow this doesn't make sense. Couldn't Florida have found a team in the west, or out of the playoffs to give them a 4th or 5th for Vatrano? You don't trade a roster player for draft picks to a team you may very well see in the playoffs??
So in a league of inches, smaller moves aren't relevant?If Vatrano is the reason the Rangers hypothetically beat the Panthers in a playoff series, then Florida had other problems.
Totally agree, but not only could he possibly improve the team, but he could also be flipped to another club for a guy that really could tip the balance. It's just a very odd tradeAs someone else posted, Rangers had the cap space for the deal and while it would make for a gripping narrative, the chances of Frank Vatrano being the key to the Rangers beating the Panthers in the playoffs is, while not impossible, highly unlikely.
So in a league of inches, smaller moves aren't relevant?
Totally agree, but not only could he possibly improve the team, but he could also be flipped to another club for a guy that really could tip the balance. It's just a very odd trade
I honestly don’t even know if he’s in our healthy lineupI'm happy for Frank. He genuinely seems to care, and by all accounts was great in the room. He just couldn't get into our lineup.
Cant believe R. Strome is still playing, he looked DONE back in Edmonton.I honestly don’t even know if he’s in our healthy lineup
Kreider-Zibanejad-Kakko
Panarin-Strome-Copp
Lafreniere-Chytil-Goodrow
Blais-Motte-Reaves
Vatrano/Rooney/Hunt/Gauthier/Brodzinski
No one in that top 9 is getting scratched for Vatrano and he’s not a 4th line player. Maybe Chytil but he’s playing well lately and Goodrow is better on wing. Sure they can move Copp to 3C and Vatrano to either top 6 RW spot but Gallant seems to like Copp in the top 6
186 points in 251 games with the Rangers. He’s got warts as a player and I prefer that Copp is prioritized in the off-season over him, but he was clearly utilized very poorly in Edmonton.Cant believe R. Strome is still playing, he looked DONE back in Edmonton.
Cant believe R. Strome is still playing, he looked DONE back in Edmonton.
We didn't pay much and to be honest he's been a breathe of fresh air compared to other players we had in his spot/bottom 6 players. So even if this success disappears, it still wasn't a bad move to make. Anything that takes Hunt away from the top 6 is a good move. Laf was pushed to the 3rd line back on his original LW side, and Vatrano was given the top role with Kreider and Zibanejad. Is he a top line player? No. But it does help balance our roster out a bit.Love seeing him prosper but unfortunately this is the usual piece of the mystery of vatrano. Gets called up and looks like a stud. Has a snapshot that can compete with the best when hes got alot of space. Unfortunately he puts himself in weird spots and tries to do to much. He has wheels as well