bfaust30
Registered User
- Dec 25, 2015
- 535
- 94
Rick Nash (50%) retained + Lindberg + 2018 Rangers 2nd rounder for Lindholm. Maybe another late pick from the Rangers.
If I were Anaheim I would not be enthused about that offer
Rick Nash (50%) retained + Lindberg + 2018 Rangers 2nd rounder for Lindholm. Maybe another late pick from the Rangers.
I would have to say the Ducks easily say no.
That's not close to the basis of a Lindholm deal.
How about same offer for Vatanen? Seems like an overpay from Rangers perspective. Maybe take Lindberg out.
Nash (50% retained) + 2nd rounder for Vatanen
How about same offer for Vatanen? Seems like an overpay from Rangers perspective. Maybe take Lindberg out.
Nash (50% retained) + 2nd rounder for Vatanen
well compare it to belowIs it rlly that off?
Rick Nash (50%) retained + Lindberg + 2018 Rangers 2nd rounder for Lindholm. Maybe another late pick from the Rangers.
How about same offer for Vatanen? Seems like an overpay from Rangers perspective. Maybe take Lindberg out.
Nash (50% retained) + 2nd rounder for Vatanen
Rick Nash (50%) retained + Lindberg + 2018 Rangers 2nd rounder for Lindholm. Maybe another late pick from the Rangers.
rick nash (50%) retained + lindberg + 2018 rangers 2nd rounder for lindholm. Maybe another late pick from the rangers.
well compare it to below
ANA
McDonaugh
NYR
Kesler (50%)
Despres
ANA 2018-2nd
would you do this...?
Is it rlly that off?
well compare it to below
ANA
McDonaugh
NYR
Kesler (50%)
Despres
ANA 2018-2nd
would you do this...?
Not comparable at all. Nash is a 1st line winger that averages over 30 goals a year and is due for a bounce back year. Kesler at this point is a 2nd line center at best.
Oh and McDonagh is definitely better than Lindholm. McDonagh is a proven #1 top-10 defender, Lindholm has potential but isn't at that point.
At best? He is a second line center.
Yeah in Anaheim where center depth behind Getzlaf is scarce.
There's a lot of teams in which he would play 3rd line center.