RangersFan
Registered User
Glad to see some player movement. Hopefully more moves coming.
Doubt it. Parssinen can't score for his life
Which is why I'm terrified of Gabe coming on board with this coach.Just not sure there's no fixing this team. We've lost players that seemed to care, but weren't put in a position to succeed. Lindy should have been on 3rd pair at some point. Chytil should have been "no less" than a 2C, Trouba should have been gone the moment after we signed him, KK should have been on 1st PP and especially Laffy the same.
Young kids NEED to feel appreciated and more importantly they NEED to build their self esteem and confidence. By no means am I saying that the "world" should be handed to them, but for crying out loud.........give them half a chance, and see where that leads you.
Burying them, doesn't do anyone good, especially us fans, that KNOW better, lmao.
anyone who doesn't believe that lindgren will have relative success playing a 3rd pairing/pk role on a good team like Col is fooling themselves.
he was asked to do too much here. and he always would be
Even if Lindgren doesn't improve, he's still probably an improvement over De Haan in the third pair. Don't get me wrong, the trade is still awful from Colorado POV but I don't think Lindgren will sink their boat. He will probably be a serviceable 3rd pairing guy for Avs.He won’t.
He got skull f***ed anytime he was taken away from Fox. Limited role or whatever Lindgren is a liability.
Colorado is such a shit fit for him too. It’s like they’re trying to re create the Manson trade while ignoring the deficiencies of the player.
I mean better than giving him top 4 minutes but that doesn’t mean he’s going to be successful or even playable. Lindgren types always come with the highest rate of buyers remorse.
This is most likely 100% accurate but I also can't help noticing that Lindgren started sucking at around the same time Housley started running the defense. I wonder if we see him improve when he is playing an appropriate number of minutes against appropriate competition within an actual defensive system.Well at least with Lindgren, despite all the analytical advances that have been made, it seems most trades are still reputation-based. And so GMs still see Lindgren as the tough as nails defensive defenseman who lays it all on the line every night and is a leader. They don't seem to care that in terms of his actual, tangible contribution, he's terrible.
It's the same rationale behind the Trouba trade. GMs look past the fact that he's cooked and focus on his reputation as a guy who can play huge minutes in all situations, change the game with his physicality, and serve as an effective leader on and off the ice. He's actually garbage but again, reputation.
I see his skating as fine. He’s not a burnerHe’s a bad skater. I think putting two wingers who can skate and forecheck is a prerequisite if you want a guy like parssinen to have any success on a line.
Did no one realize that Drury worked this weekend?
Vesey-Chytil-Kakko
Lindgren-Trouba
We hardly knew ya.The Hank Kempf dream is over.
What similarities does Pars have to Rempe & Edstrom?You’ll notice a specific trend in the bottom 6 guys Drury and his group are elevating and targeting. Edstrom, Rempe, Parrsonnen