Minimal value, I think he`ll clear waivers. He`s been pretty bad.Does de Haan have any value or is he at the point where he’d likely make it through waivers?
Does de Haan have any value or is he at the point where he’d likely make it through waivers?
Minimal value, I think he`ll clear waivers. He`s been pretty bad.
That makes too much sensePut him between Othmann and Kaliev?
I do think that. We can agree to disagree.So by extension are you saying Kakko is more skilled than Chytil? I'm not sure I agree.
I dunno. With Fox out for a minute and Lindgren gone (to remind that Mancini is also gone and Jones potentially following the suit), I could see that Drury asked for De Haan to be that 6/7 insurance for the Rangers.de Haan sucks but he's also played significant games for three of the league's best franchises over the past three seasons. I would not be at all surprised if another contender wanted him as a 6/7. I'm mean you're talking like a 6th or 7th in return, or a C prospect, but I don't think that's an unrealistic outcome.
We have nobody to shelter anybody.I haven't checked but I thought I saw someone say De Haan's numbers were OK for a 3rd pair sheltered guy, but currently doesn't look like they've called anyone up so with Fox out they'll still shift another player to RD and De Hann will be in?
Miller-Borgen
Jones-Schnieder
De Haan - Vaakanainen ?
Dunno actually what the pairings have been lately with injuries and things getting mixed around.
I kinda doubt they'll flip de haan, suspect he's just some vet insurance for the rest of the year
Also don't think they're going full fire sale like some of you think.
I agree, I think it's most likely that he is kept, although if we were to lose the three games pre-TDL that may change things. I don't foresee a fire sale but I do think they'd move someone like Reilly Smith.I dunno. With Fox out for a minute and Lindgren gone (to remind that Mancini is also gone and Jones potentially following the suit), I could see that Drury asked for De Haan to be that 6/7 insurance for the Rangers.
Parssinen seems to play a very similar game to Edstrom, but with better hands around the net and less speed.
de Haan sucks but he's also played significant games for three of the league's best franchises over the past three seasons. I would not be at all surprised if another contender wanted him as a 6/7. I'm mean you're talking like a 6th or 7th in return, or a C prospect, but I don't think that's an unrealistic outcome.
He's cheap playoff depth for a contender.
Instead of a magic bean super low pic or ECHL prospect, i'd love it if we scouted an off the radar enforcer type with potential to play meaningfull 4th line minutes, similar to poaching Colton Orr from Boston that one dealine for basically nothing.
De Hann + some highly skilled but low IQ AHL magic bean for a young AHL or CHL enforcer with potential. A move for 2/3y down the road.
de Haan was/is supposedly good at moving the puck/blocking shots. So, regardless that he's 34 that's a bit better than what Lindy provided if he still has it. Gonna have to ask my cousin (a huge Avalanche fan) about what's up with him now as well as Parssinen.Great trade. Literally any return for these guys would be a win.
We know what Lindgren is at this point, and it’s sad that the game has taken so much out of him, but he had to go.
I still like Vesey as a versatile forward, but he was not being used here. Best for both of us to move him.
As for the return, the draft picks are nice. I’m not expecting much of anything from de Haan. He seems pretty terrible. I have some hope for Parssinen. Maybe this is a player that our pro scouts like and think is underutilized. Time will tell. Even if he turns out to be a plug, the trade is still a win.
Day late and a dollar short. KK is probably cussing Drury right now. Deservedly so.It's pretty smart of Drury to bring in all these Finns to help out Kakko.