People in this thread who think the Sabres are going to get this ridiculous package consisting of multiple first line players in return for a guy who supposedly wants out are out to lunch.
Eichel is also, younger, plays a higher valued position, has produced more offensively and is signed long term. The Stone comparison is way off and is more suited for maybe an O'Reilly comparison but again, position.I gave an example of Stone's deal and evaluated the returns in Stone's deal. Stop being obtuse. You said "Buffalo wouldn't trade Eichel for Brannstrom and 2nd" when no one should be able to draw that conclusion based on what I wrote.
People in this thread who think the Sabres are going to get this ridiculous package consisting of multiple first line players in return for a guy who supposedly wants out are out to lunch.
You forgot they are just going to take whatever players they want from a teams roster and highly regarded prospects have minimal value because they haven't proven anything on the ice.
Sabre fans think they are going to get McDavid for Eichel because at least he has proven something lol.
i later realised that op was amended and kravtsov was in the initial offer. i still think nyr would be stupid to turn down such a deal. eichel is an absolutely awesome 1c. way better than zibanejad.
even with karvtsov in the deal, this isn't 4 quarters for one dollar offer. most of the pieces from the rangers are closer to a dime than a quarter in comparison with eichel. at least one of the pieces should have a chance to become as impactful as eichel is today. imo none of the pieces from the rangers offers this kind of upside. kakko has a chance to become a top line winger. strome is a middle 6er. chytil is also heading that way and kravtsov might turn into one. rangers could easily replace those middle 6er. a player like eichel is tough to come by.
I’d love to see what kind of offers these fans would make for another teams top player.
Guaranteed no offers include Dahlin, Cozens or Reinhart
Ryan Strome- 35 point player in Edmonton, came to New York and fell into a great situation playing next to a star in Panarin. Revived his career. Is he likely a better player than he showed in Edmonton? Sure. Is he a 60 point player when not attached to Panarin? Probably not.
He doesn't want out no reports he does other than your opinion and although iam late in this discussion what first line players are you talking about?People in this thread who think the Sabres are going to get this ridiculous package consisting of multiple first line players in return for a guy who supposedly wants out are out to lunch.
Buffalo hangs up. Classic HFboards: we want one of the best young centres in hockey but don’t want to give away any of our best young pieces. Who from the OPs offer is a game changer for Buffalo?Seeing Eichel in the East for 6 more years needs a huge overpay for the Sabres to consider it. Rather send him to LA.
I've lost IQ points just reading that drivel.You're aware he's been playing through an UBI all year, a LBI for a couple weeks now, and that he scored 36 goals in 68 games last year?
Carry on.
Ok let's do that. Chytil- Nice young player, trending towards being a top 6 center. Kakko- Could be a top 6 player. That's based more on pedigree than actual on-ice results at this point though. Awful rookie year, this year looks more engaged, still can't score. Personally not a huge fan. Ryan Strome- 35 point player in Edmonton, came to New York and fell into a great situation playing next to a star in Panarin. Revived his career. Is he likely a better player than he showed in Edmonton? Sure. Is he a 60 point player when not attached to Panarin? Probably not. Also he's a UFA at the end of next season and will be looking for a raise. Not the type of player a rebuilding team would target.
So yeah for a franchise player that's a pile of garbage.
You used the Stone deal but they are not similar at all.I gave an example of Stone's deal and evaluated the returns in Stone's deal. Stop being obtuse. You said "Buffalo wouldn't trade Eichel for Brannstrom and 2nd" when no one should be able to draw that conclusion based on what I wrote.
Gonna end up being like Nash, it'll throw everyone off the loop for what they deemed Eichel's true value to be. There's a lot more complications in a trade like this and in the real world players never get moved for what they should be worth.
Probably a maintained package of
+Strome
+Kakko
+Lundkvist
+Georgiev
+1st Rd. Pick
No team in this league is going to move a Zegras or a Byfield and the Rangers certainly aren't moving Laf or Fox (definitely not Fox, his value will be near Eichel's level come pretty soon). BUF doesn't have to move him but things are going to keep getting very bad and a rookie GM with no proper overseer leaves the probability for an Eichel trade to be even less than what I proposed, much higher.
we won't add Eich and his 10m
cost controlled Dahlin or bust
and it won't be bluest blue chip elcs regardless of continued requests for same.
suf value in 20 somethings Zib/Buch/Strome +
We have all the D we need going forward to be competitive, only thing it's lacking is a veteran LD who's won cups. Dahlin would be nice but I'd much rather have a top flight C and taking advantage of him being available. We can add his 10 easily with the players your moving within the deal and having our cap penalties eased on (Shattenkirk/Girardi/Lundqvist). And with DeAngelo's 4 being ousted we'll have more wiggle room to make things work. Only really have to somewhat worry about Zibanejad but I don't think he'll be getting upwards of 10 anymore.
How often is an elite 1C traded. I’ll wait.How often is a dollar traded for a dollar?
Only when they dont want to play for their team anymoreHow often is an elite 1C traded. I’ll wait.
Fun fact. Ryan Strome has as many points this year as Eichel this season::Checks notes::
We're all aware that Eichel has 2 goals this season right?
Carry on.
Your question kind of proves my point. These kind of players are rarely traded—so to think that another elite #1C is coming back in return is, at the very least, ambitious. So my point remains, how often is a dollar traded for a dollar?How often is an elite 1C traded. I’ll wait.
When that happens we will trade him out West for a fair deal. Adams is aware of the O’Rielly trade I’m sure.Only when they dont want to play for their team anymore
1. Eich is not really available. They will deal Dahlin to keep Eich if it comes to that, unless Eich himself wants out.
2. Dahlin is not to add a LD. It is to acquire a cost controlled premium asset. Which Eichel is not.
thinks 2 steps outside the box.
Get Dahlin, up his value. See Chytil emerge. Take stock of Kravtsov, Barron.
Then as Dahlin is mid of his rfa at max value, flip him for high end prospects and picks, incl possibly a C.
move Zib/Buch/Strome who do not fit long term, for futures.
Utilize our new found ability to draft well.
Your question kind of proves my point. These kind of players are rarely traded—so to think that another elite #1C is coming back in return is, at the very least, ambitious. So my point remains, how often is a dollar traded for a dollar?
If you want to respond with "then BUF won't trade him," that's fine. But if an when he is dealt will not be for a similar player (if for no other reason than I don't see a similar player available).
they are? news to me.Well there's no elite young centreman coming back to Buffalo, so there is really no allure for the Sabres TBH.
Franchise centres are extremely hard to find - which is why NYR is desperate for Eichel & why BUF doesn't consider this.
if you think Laine is a clear cut elite piece that proves your point, I think you are being disingenuous.PLD just got Laine plus. Laine. It doesn’t matter what the Rangers offer, they will trade him out of the conference.
Doesn't address my comment one bit. But if this is making you feel better, keep at it.PLD just got Laine plus. Laine. It doesn’t matter what the Rangers offer, they will trade him out of the conference.
Keep him. Enjoy!they are? news to me.
also, Chytil would be the third best young player in your org.