Larry Hanson
Registered User
- Aug 1, 2020
- 1,909
- 3,411
Misunderstood you then but I think Treliving would do the deal also. Not that often that #1 centres are on the market for trade or in free agency.
No problem. Have a great day.If the first name NYR says on the phone isn't Laf the call ends right there
You know what happened every time someone crowded Messier on the ice right?Sure but how is it going to look when your Captain spears someone in the groin. Call me old-fashioned but captains should be professional and not pests.
Sabres aren’t getting a prospect of Lafs caliber if Eichel asks for a trade.Rangers aren’t getting Eichel without Lafreniere.
Sabres aren’t getting a prospect of Lafs caliber if Eichel asks for a trade.
LOL, Ok, and Laf can and will keep playing in NY.He can keep playing in Buffalo.
He can keep playing in Buffalo.
Rangers aren’t getting Eichel without Lafreniere.
To New York:
Jack Eichel (6 years left @ 10 Million)
To Buffalo:
Filip Chytil (1 year left @ 894,166)
Kaapo Kakko (2 years left @ 925,000)
Ryan Strome (2 years left @ 4.5 Million)
New York’s Rationale:
Addresses the most glaring hole in their lineup at C with one the league’s premier talent with 6 years left on his contract. The Rangers look almost ready to contend and adding Eichel is a gigantic step forward.
Buffalo’s Rationale:
Puts Eichel out of his misery while recouping some valuable and young assets that will be apart of their core long term. If they can flip Hall with a plus for a decent young defensemen or a D prospect, their core will be pretty solid.
Does this at least get the conversation started between Buffalo and New York? Who adds or subtracts?
*I purposely did not include picks in the package going back to Buffalo because they don’t draft too well.
EDIT: Please provide feedback rather than just saying easy no from whichever side. I actually want to understand where I went wrong.
EDIT 2: Initially included Kravstov as wellbut removed because others said it was an overpayment.
stone wasn't extended, when traded. he was in his last year and the extension was done with vegas. eichel still has years of term and is under buffalo's control. nothing comparable here.Ya'd end up selling nothing at a garage sale with that attitude. An extended Mark Stone returned Brannstrom and a 2nd. By the same logic, Stone is the best player in that trade and they trade a dollar for a quarter and a dime!
To New York:
Jack Eichel (6 years left @ 10 Million)
To Buffalo:
Filip Chytil (1 year left @ 894,166)
Kaapo Kakko (2 years left @ 925,000)
Ryan Strome (2 years left @ 4.5 Million)
New York’s Rationale:
Addresses the most glaring hole in their lineup at C with one the league’s premier talent with 6 years left on his contract. The Rangers look almost ready to contend and adding Eichel is a gigantic step forward.
Buffalo’s Rationale:
Puts Eichel out of his misery while recouping some valuable and young assets that will be apart of their core long term. If they can flip Hall with a plus for a decent young defensemen or a D prospect, their core will be pretty solid.
Does this at least get the conversation started between Buffalo and New York? Who adds or subtracts?
*I purposely did not include picks in the package going back to Buffalo because they don’t draft too well.
EDIT: Please provide feedback rather than just saying easy no from whichever side. I actually want to understand where I went wrong.
EDIT 2: Initially included Kravstov as wellbut removed because others said it was an overpayment.
You aren't paying attention. Kakko has made huge strides from last season. I don't know what he will ultimately be, but he is a first line player without question. Chytil has been the Rangers best young forward and oozes high end talent.Point being a star plus coming back. No 4 middle six players. Kakko has not impressed at all. Kings have much better futures to offer.
To New York:
Jack Eichel (6 years left @ 10 Million)
To Buffalo:
Filip Chytil (1 year left @ 894,166)
Kaapo Kakko (2 years left @ 925,000)
Ryan Strome (2 years left @ 4.5 Million)
New York’s Rationale:
Addresses the most glaring hole in their lineup at C with one the league’s premier talent with 6 years left on his contract. The Rangers look almost ready to contend and adding Eichel is a gigantic step forward.
Buffalo’s Rationale:
Puts Eichel out of his misery while recouping some valuable and young assets that will be apart of their core long term. If they can flip Hall with a plus for a decent young defensemen or a D prospect, their core will be pretty solid.
Does this at least get the conversation started between Buffalo and New York? Who adds or subtracts?
*I purposely did not include picks in the package going back to Buffalo because they don’t draft too well.
EDIT: Please provide feedback rather than just saying easy no from whichever side. I actually want to understand where I went wrong.
EDIT 2: Initially included Kravstov as wellbut removed because others said it was an overpayment.
Chytil , Kravtsov , Georgiev , Robertson , 1st
Without question? Get out of here. The guy has 4 f***ing points on the year. The OP is garbage for a franchise player. You are right on one thing though we just don't see these type of trades happen very often (star player moved for a pile of trash).You aren't paying attention. Kakko has made huge strides from last season. I don't know what he will ultimately be, but he is a first line player without question. Chytil has been the Rangers best young forward and oozes high end talent.
Jack is a great player, but I just don't see these type of trades happen very often.
Yes. Please. Because I love too hear useless fallacies.They'd be stupid to pass that up.
Want me to explain why?