Kakko Schmakko
Registered User
- Feb 24, 2018
- 5,033
- 1,570
I think ADA's chances with the Rangers are close to zero (I think he blew his chances last season), I expect him to get traded, probably thrown in with Hayes.
I think that there is a misscommunication. I was making the point that making such generalizations by utilizing one metric is wrong.Generally it's true that I'd you're hitting a lot, you are chasing, but that's the rule, and there are exceptions to that. Radko Gudas hits a TON but the guy is an exceptional defensive defenseman.
It's the guys that go out of position to hit (glass), the guys that try to use hitting as a foundation to their game (4th line goon like McCleod), or the guys that have to use snow angels (girardi) to block shots and passes... Those are the rules, but there are exceptions to those rules. You can't look at one stat and then use that as a reference point for a player being good or bad.
I'm not saying McQuaid is going to be fire for us, but let's not jump to conclusions. We gave up a 4th rounder for a UFA to be who has lots of value at the trade deadline. He's not taking minutes from anyone, and like others have stated, if ADA and Pionk can't earn minutes over McQuaid then they suck ass and they shouldn't be playing anyways.
Under AV it wasn't a meritocracy. But it pretty much was under Torts.The posts that "ADA and Pionk suck anyway if they can't beat out McQuaid" are assuming the NHL is a meritocracy.
It's the furthest thing from a meritocracy.
What points to that of all things?The mentality that this rebuild should be predicated on punching people.
Or maybe their point is that you need players who actually are not afraid of using their bodies to separate players from the puck instead of waving sticks. Or maybe their point is that a successful team needs players that bring the fight to the other team. Or maybe their point was that a mentality of constantly turning the other cheek is wrong. Or maybe their point was that you cannot build a team that is solely predicated on what metrics tell you? Or that a successful team is more than simply having players that like to dangle and move East to West?Whether you want to admit it or not, the front office has publicly made it a focal point. This move, albeit small, confirms that.
Under AV it wasn't a meritocracy. But it pretty much was under Torts.
And come one now, McQ is miles ahead of Smith. Also need to remember that the former was hurt for much of the year while the latter was out of shape and lazy.
This season is going to be the death of this place.
RIP hfnyr in advance
Honestly, it shouldn't be a meritocracy this season as we're looking beyond this year. Pionk and DeAngelo have the potential to be a part of this team's long-term future and should be given leeway to establish themselves as NHL defencemen. Unless they're unacceptably bad they should be playing every night.Beyond which, how is it a meritocracy if Pionk or DeAngelo get the call even when they don't outperform McQuaid?
Honestly, it shouldn't be a meritocracy this season as we're looking beyond this year. Pionk and DeAngelo have the potential to be a part of this team's long-term future and should be given leeway to establish themselves as NHL defencemen. Unless they're unacceptably bad they should be playing every night.
We have the luxury to do it this season, we should use it.
OK, I agree with Pionk since he can play in the AHL. But with DeAngelo the options are playing, pressbox or trade/waivers - I choose the first option. Especially with a defenceman since the perception of their play is affected a lot more by factors out of their control than forwards.That's not a good way to develop players. They have to earn their time.
The most I'd be willing to agree with that is that a tie should go to the youngster.
Honestly, it shouldn't be a meritocracy this season as we're looking beyond this year. Pionk and DeAngelo have the potential to be a part of this team's long-term future and should be given leeway to establish themselves as NHL defencemen. Unless they're unacceptably bad they should be playing every night.
We have the luxury to do it this season, we should use it.
OK, I agree with Pionk since he can play in the AHL. But with DeAngelo the options are playing, pressbox or trade/waivers - I choose the first option. Especially with a defenceman since the perception of their play is affected a lot more by factors out of their control than forwards.
Depends...I tend to hate coaching decisions I can't rationalize whatsoever. If I understand, but disagree, that's cool. But stuff like playing tanner glass with zucc....I'll never understand..and yeah..he's then a moron.It'll be fun to see how long it takes for Quinn to become a moron.
I think you're totally wrong. Right handed play making defenseman with unreql junior numbers and very very strong ahl numbers? Someone will take a flier.I don't think DeAngelo would have any problem clearing waivers if he doesn't make the team out of camp.
It'll be fun to see how long it takes for Quinn to become a moron.
Nah. I'm fine with that line being broken up. What I'm not fine with is buch playing with McLeod and fasth as a center in the 4th line or whatever ridiculous combo av would try.The first time we hear about potential lines in practice before the first preseason game?
Guarantee if there's no Buch-Zib-Kreider line a whole lot of people are going to complain
Nah. I'm fine with that line being broken up. What I'm not fine with is buch playing with McLeod and fasth as a center in the 4th line or whatever ridiculous combo av would try.
Buch on a line with say namestnikov and chytil? Sign me up. Buch on a line with spooner and Hayes? Sure let's try it. Buch with McLeod and vesey? Kill me now.
I don't think DeAngelo would have any problem clearing waivers if he doesn't make the team out of camp.
Wanna put money on this?
Would be the easiest buck I've ever made.
Wanna put money on this?
Would be the easiest buck I've ever made.
Honestly, I don’t think he’s going to get sent down. He might not be on the opening night roster, but if he’s not I fully expect that he’ll be in a rotation with the other guys.
But I also never bet on things like this, because I always allow for the possibility that I’m wrong.
I’m expecting that to be the case for the majority of the season as long as they make sure Pionk and ADA get the necessary ice time. Sitting up in the box with Greg Brown to dissect the defense wouldn’t be the worst thing, and they’d still have the benefit of practicing with the teams regularly.Honestly, I don’t think he’s going to get sent down. He might not be on the opening night roster, but if he’s not I fully expect that he’ll be in a rotation with the other guys.
But I also never bet on things like this, because I always allow for the possibility that I’m wrong.
How dare you not take an extreme stance on this website!!