NVious
Registered User
- Dec 20, 2022
- 1,551
- 3,479
Would do this, seems like both guys need a change of scenery. How has he been in Ottawa last few years?Chabot
What's the catch? Nylander's contract is a 1 year rental but Chabot's is not. Seems like Ottawa is giving too much? Or has Chabot's play absolutely fallen off a cliff?Chabot
Surely the names I’m throwing out doesn’t necessarily mean 1v1 trades.What's the catch? Nylander's contract is a 1 year rental but Chabot's is not. Seems like Ottawa is giving too much? Or has Chabot's play absolutely fallen off a cliff?
Would do this, seems like both guys need a change of scenery. How has he been in Ottawa last few years?
Clearly you've never been to Toronto.Why does Nylander having a career year scoring over PPG need a change of scenery?
Oh okay. That wasn't clear at all.Surely the names I’m throwing out doesn’t necessarily mean 1v1 trades.
Just bases.
The season no longer has any value in Toronto, unironically all 3 of them could smash Gretzky's records and if they don't win in the playoffs or at least make a very deep and substantial run, it means nothing.Why does Nylander having a career year scoring over PPG need a change of scenery?
Not a chance. Nylander won't return a pick that high, and Toronto doesn't have the cap to eat those contracts.Nylander for Garland, 11OA, Myers
wont return a pick that high? he just put up 40 goals and 87 points... i'd be looking to move him for a like aged #1-2 D that has a mean streak or the #2 overall pick not one as low as 11 unless the adds were betterNot a chance. Nylander won't return a pick that high, and Toronto doesn't have the cap to eat those contracts.
Canucks already have the skill up front. We need Ryan Hartman type wingers, not skilled floaters/gamebreakers.
This scenario involves Toronto taking a cap dump in Myers and a slightly negative asset in Garland. This isn’t Nylander on his own. I’m more familiar with Toronto’s cap situation than 95% of this board. They can eat Myers for a year.Not a chance. Nylander won't return a pick that high, and Toronto doesn't have the cap to eat those contracts.
Canucks already have the skill up front. We need Ryan Hartman type wingers, not skilled floaters/gamebreakers.
there is life to this 1.detroit loves dynamic swedesKubalik + Lucas Raymond
for
W.Nylander
Leafs get a boatload of cap space. Can go after UFAs...
there is life to this 1.detroit loves dynamic swedes
Just to clarify. You’re saying Nylander won’t get a pick that high because he has one year left on his deal?Not a chance. Nylander won't return a pick that high, and Toronto doesn't have the cap to eat those contracts.
Canucks already have the skill up front. We need Ryan Hartman type wingers, not skilled floaters/gamebreakers.
Not a chance. Nylander won't return a pick that high, and Toronto doesn't have the cap to eat those contracts.
Canucks already have the skill up front. We need Ryan Hartman type wingers, not skilled floaters/gamebreakers.
He's been frequenting the hot dog stand.Why does Nylander having a career year scoring over PPG need a change of scenery?
I'd probably do this, Raymond is a good player and significantly cheaper. Maybe change Kubalik for something else but yeah.Kubalik + Lucas Raymond
for
W.Nylander
Leafs get a boatload of cap space. Can go after UFAs...