Yeah....but as many others have said, they don't actually know who is on the board at this point. Usually this kind of trade is made at the draft when you move up and get the guy you want.It's not strange at all if Chicago has further moves they're trying to make.
They can package #18 and #34 to move even further up if they really have a target in mind.
Yeah....but as many others have said, they don't actually know who is on the board at this point. Usually this kind of trade is made at the draft when you move up and get the guy you want.
So it's kinda bizarre to do it now.
Maybe The Hawks are not done. Possible trade down. Flip picks +playerCan someone tell me why the f*** Chicago would do this deal without even knowing what player would be available at 18 and 50??
I must be missing something right? Surely the valuation of moving up 2 spots in R1, and 4 spots in R2, BLINDLY, is not at the cost of an additional 2nd rounder.
This has to be the stupidest trade I think I've seen in a while. And to think Luo Lamerillo of all people got the best of someone is even more hilarious
someone smarter than me please explain this
TIA
horrible trade for Chicago lol
But there is no guarantee whoever they would want at 12 will even be available.If the Hawks are trying to move up to #12 or so, this makes total sense.
Get this done now so you're not scrambling trying to make 3 trades on draft day.
Now you only have to make 1 or 2 and you have a month to set it up.
This makes more sense. They're targeting an NHL player and the team won't let him go unless they get a high-end pick+ in return.Maybe Chicago has a trade in mind for a top-end player, where they needed a higher 1st Rd. pick in order to facilitate it? Granted, it's only 2 spots, but, you never know.
Maybe they are assessing how the draft board is going to shake out and are happy with 3 guys that would be available in that 12th slot and they are obviously fairly confident one of them will be there.But there is no guarantee whoever they would want at 12 will even be available.
Like no, it doesn't really make sense. Now say they make another draft payment to move up the board again. And then it's draft day and the guy they wanted is picked at 11. What...was the point of bleeding the picks? To not get the guy you want?
I'm confused at why this deal was made now instead of at the draft. Usually it's because there's a guy they like that's still available so unless this is part 1 of another deal or Chicago knows exactly who is going to be taken in the first 17 picks, I don't understand why this trade couldn't wait.
But there is no guarantee whoever they would want at 12 will even be available.
Like no, it doesn't really make sense. Now say they make another draft payment to move up the board again. And then it's draft day and the guy they wanted is picked at 11. What...was the point of bleeding the picks? To not get the guy you want?
Or their internal list has a huge drop at even 16, or 17. It is one thing to be in a position hoping a team or 2 has a different evaluation of just one or 2 guys then hoping 3 or 4 "reach".Either setting up a trade or their list has a huge drop after #18.
Quality over quantity and they'll need the contract space going forward.
By PuckPedia’s draft value model, its fairly even with Chicago slightly ahead. Chicago would have had to send NYI a 5th to even out the gap.
That's true but we already have a deep prospect pool with a lot more depth coming through the next few years. Going forward the Hawks have...If the draft was that linear and scientific, sure. Once you get passed the first, half, and that's probably generous, of the 1st rd, you're probably picking a guy to pick a guy because you have to pick a guy. Even the top 10 is questionable.
The lower you go in the draft, you probably want quantity over quality. Look at various 2nd and 3rd rds in draft history. Nobody know who the quality is.
Yeah but they probably like some of those guys, and don't like some of them.No guarantee but then you're still picking 12th, not 18th or 20th.
Who may be available at #12? Iginla, Yakemchuk, Jiricek, Catton, Buium? None of those guys should be there at #18 or #20.