kfan22
Registered User
- Jun 20, 2012
- 2,985
- 140
Looks like good chance you get Eagles now in 1st roundWay short on the FG attempt. To OT they go.
Looks like good chance you get Eagles now in 1st roundWay short on the FG attempt. To OT they go.
Perfect. That's who we want.Looks like good chance you get Eagles now in 1st round
lol I was wrong and still covered.Close one with 4:32 left.
you must not want to advance then!Perfect. That's who we want.
You say that like it matters. If you want to go to the Super Bowl, you have to beat at least 2-3 really good teams. What difference does it make if they play the eagles or the rams? Both teams played close games with the packers already.you must not want to advance then!
Vikings would have $5 mill left to allocate against the cap of the $10 mill they paid Darnold.Right now, Spotrac is showing and factoring in $5M for Darnold and $4.2M for Murphy Jr as "void years" on the 2025 cap. Does anybody know, if they re-sign one or both of those guys, do the "void years" count alongside whatever they sign for, or does the new contract take the place of that?
So if they re-sign both to 4 year deals, they essentially gain ~$6.9M in cap space onto what they're currently showing? Before the new contracts are factored in, of course. That would be very helpful.Vikings would have $5 mill left to allocate against the cap of the $10 mill they paid Darnold.
If darnold were to get say $40 mill per on a new deal in say straight base salary his cap hit for 2025 to 2028 would then be $41.25 mill. You just add the cap charge for his SB annual allocation to the new cap charge he would take on his new deal.
If he walks, you eat all $5 mill of it in 2025.
Way too early to be looking at the team cap situation. Can always restructure deals to change base salary into a bonus to free up space.So if they re-sign both to 4 year deals, they essentially gain ~$6.9M in cap space onto what they're currently showing? Before the new contracts are factored in, of course. That would be very helpful.
Well Kwesi seems to be a Cap wizard. I say this seeing as how he's freed up or horrible cap situation in, what, a year or two?Way too early to be looking at the team cap situation. Can always restructure deals to change base salary into a bonus to free up space.
Yeah, doesn't seem like a huge deal to keep Darnold and not have to gut other areas, assuming he's willing to leave a little bit of money on the table to stay in a pretty great situation.Way too early to be looking at the team cap situation. Can always restructure deals to change base salary into a bonus to free up space.
The only time the packers moved the ball effectively was when Love was allowed to pass the ball on 1st and 2nd down.Jordan Love is not a line driver.
Should’ve been a penalty and if he was gonna do it to anyone (he shouldn’t), it should’ve been against Kerby Joseph.It was pointed out to me that Tucker Kraft was the Packer player complaining the Lions players were targeting knees, while he hit Pat Jones in the knees...
Just interesting information.
Finally found the video:It’s not Reed’s fault Love doesn’t know how to make The ball stick to Reed’s hands.
Have they not watched The Replacements?
The only time the packers moved the ball effectively was when Love was allowed to pass the ball on 1st and 2nd down.
Finally found the video:
Jayden Reed 1 catch on 4 targets for 6 yards. He’s been so disappointing. Watson is definitely better.
It was pointed out to me that Tucker Kraft was the Packer player complaining the Lions players were targeting knees, while he hit Pat Jones in the knees...
Just interesting information.
Also interesting.
Why would Tucker Kraft go eye for an eye on that? Both are actually legal plays. The reason the viking player was called was due to a newer defensive rule change.Possible eye for an eye situation?
I don't like that block either.