I like Palat but surely this deal must feel like a lump of coal in the stocking for Devils fans after yesterday's events.
I think it depends on whether or not you believed they were getting Johnny. Some people did, some people didn't. Certainly hits different ways for each. Some people didn't want him period because of the contract.
I don't mind signing Palat. I think he's valuable for on ice contributions and intangibles. But I don't think it takes a rocket surgeon to know that you shouldn't give 31 year olds 5 year deals in free agency. If this is a 3 year deal, nobody bats an eyelash about his fit with the devils, whether they should have signed him, etc. Perfect example is the David Perron signing. There shouldn't be too many people saying, "well, they shouldn't have signed him because he doesn't align with their timeline". That's silly. If the Devils had made the trade for Patches that Carolina did, nobody is thinking that they messed up or made a weird move.
Is it possible that he ages fine? Absolutely. I wouldn't have thought Pavelski would still be a ppg player at age 37, and David Perron has put together some of his best seasons at age 31, 32, 33. But the process is not great. I think it's okay to say that. The process should not be signing 31 year old guys in free agency. Perron, Pavelski...those are the exceptions, not the rule.
But I don't think anyone on the devils board hates the player or thinks he's not the type of player we desperately need.