lastcupever75
Phive cups PA.
- May 14, 2009
- 5,758
- 261
I'll stick to using actual stats instead of +/-
Watch the guy play. He's not an offense guy. He's a guy that has top line potential. I just think EDM could've gotten him and a little bit more for Hall.
Larsson and Puljuarvi. I've soured on the old core and have been wanting a culture change for a while now.Curious, if any EDM fans see this.
Would you rather keep Hall and draft a D at 4th
or have Larsson and Puljujarvi.
He's pretty brutal at trades especially giving away talented forwards. My sympathies to Oilers fans.Chiarelli and Edmonton are a match made in heaven for HF.
Curious, if any EDM fans see this.
Would you rather keep Hall and draft a D at 4th
or have Larsson and Puljujarvi.
Curious, if any EDM fans see this.
Would you rather keep Hall and draft a D at 4th
or have Larsson and Puljujarvi.
Addition by subtraction for the Oilers. Ballsy trade but they're a better team than they were yesterday.
New Jersey definitely is better.
The Stanley Cup finals where he was a healthy scratch every game?
ThisLarsson isn't a beast. Solid, nothing special.
I keep seeing this. How are you going to replace this production:
NHL forwards, 2012-16, min 1,000 minutes, ranked by 5v5 PTS/60:
1. Sidney Crosby: 2.71
2. Jamie Benn: 2.54
3. Taylor Hall: 2.49
Addition by subtraction
Not sure what that means or how Hall leaving effects it?That ppm, hall has been hurt half his career.
Offence will get spread out amount the rest of the team.
I'm willing to bet the oilers have a better gf in the coming year without hall than they did with him last year.
They will have a better ga as well
This
Larsson is a mid range #2 D
Outside McD that's a horrible first line with a rookie on it.lucic mcdavid jesse
pouliot dra eberle
maroon rnh nail
dam they still got a nice top 9...nj wins this but its not horrible...but edm needs D, larsson and nurse is a good start
Haha I love you, Roo. It's truly charming that you enter this thread to nitpick some of my statements made months ago and took the time to look them up. I now know who to call when I need to do some quick "digging" on people.
You're right, I should not have called him a #3 because he is one of the best defensive d in the league. It is just fair to wonder how much of his rise was due to getting time with Greene when so many have been much better with AG than away.
It feels good to get a better offensive player than Giroux, and not pay fair value. Can you forgive me for being so excited?