Chia sounds like hes describing Gudbransson, which didnt cost anything close to a Hall. Devils fans rejoice.
Was that mark spector asking the question? That guy is such a frigging troll.
I'm sorry PW, I love ya pal, but Larsson and the words "good" do not belong in the same sentence. This was a TERRIBLE trade for Edmonton, no matter how anyone spins it.
So is Larssons ceiling Hjalmarsson?
Gudbranson is a 3rd pairing D
The difference between Gudbranson and Larsson is not the same as the difference between McCann + 33 and Taylor Hall.
So is Larssons ceiling Hjalmarsson?
I like Larsson better than Hamonic. If both were on the table and rumour has it they were, I choose Larsson because his potential is higher. I see Hamonic as being at his peak and Larsson as barely scratching the surface of his. And both are about equal now.
So you took time to point out that Taylor Hall is a better even strength and power play producer than Milan Lucic?
Thanks....I guess?
Just goes tho show the value of a top 4, RH'ed d-man in this league is immense.
Vlasic. Elite defense and "good enough" offense.
Ehh, I doubt he'll ever reach Vlasic level. Right now he's no offense and good enough defense. He's got a long way to go.
Vlasic. Elite defense and "good enough" offense.
Oh my Chiarelli, what are you doing. Edmonton fans calling Larsson ''elite'', and NJ fans calling him ''vastly underrated'' on here still doesn't justify doing this 1-1 trade at all. Edmonton got hosed, and Hall will turn into a stud with the Devils. I wonder what Benning in Vancouver is up to....
Oh he is but 30 points isn't a huge gap and then you add pulju and Larsson.
So yes Edmonton loses the trade, but they get better.
Now. If lucic ends up not signing then Edmonton loses a lot of offense.