As a Devils fan, this is a little bit more than I expected them to give up but not awful.
Figured a 2025 1st round pick was the most likely asset to go back. Should be a late round pick. I liked Bahl, but not sure how confident NJ was going with him next season penciled in the lineup. Devils were looking for an upgrade at LD to go along with Siegenthaler and Luke Hughes.
Glad they held onto the #10 pick - could get a good LD or forward in that spot. I also like that they kept Holtz - want to see how he does after another offseason (improved a good amount last year) and with a new coaching staff.
Huh? I said 1st and prospect. I also assumed 50% retained. The prospect is only kind of a prospect.Flames fans deluded themselves on what they were getting for Markstrom. And as is, I think the Devils still overpaid.
When are they getting those guys thenActually, pretty good value as based. Calgary needs a couple good dmen.
They just traded a 34 year old goalie for a first round pick and a prospect.
“Terrible return” - random hfboards poster
Eternal rebuildFlames have 6 1sts in the next 3 drafts. Pretty solid start to the rebuild or retool... whatever they want to call it.
See now it makes sense. For a full-price Markstrom this was mid-to-bad for the Devils but for a discounted one, it's worth upgrading the pick. Thank you to whoever talked some sense into Calgary's owner.
I said at 50% retained. I said 1st and prospect guaranteed. Bahl is 23. He's well under the 25 cut off every site around uses.I mean, Holtz/Casey and a 1st is very different than Bahl and a 1st. Bahl isn't a "prospect", he's a depth NHL defenseman with pretty limited upside.
I don't think the cap is much of a concern for the Flames the next two years.Oof that amount of salary retention makes this a pretty crappy return for Calgary I think.