I agree- When you step back and look at the big picture, drafting a guy like Nils in the first isn't easy.Looks good to me, see what happens.
1st round picks are highly overrated, Faksa, Honka, Glennie, Campbell, Dellandrea, Tufte, Gurianov etc. were all first round picks. Not really concerning losing a player of that stature.
I rarely disagree with Derek, but I can't imagine even an NHL GM (and we all know they are capable of idiotic decisions) giving up a 1st round pick + for a 7th defender. Your owner and presumably Nill himself believe this is a playoff team. That's all they care about. They're not giving up a 1st round pick right now for 2 or 3 years down the line. They're expecting that kid to play immediately and play well.
I think this trade tells you what Nill thinks of the d-men on the roster. You don't make a trade like this for a guy you'll bury as the #7 d-man. He's probably leaping right onto a PP spot and to second pair minutes.
I know first round picks have good value, but the Stars think of themselves as playoff bound again. Nill is seeing this as giving up a first rounder in the back half of the round for a guy he also clearly thinks is ahead of Harley.
I think if they went into this season expecting Harley to take a massive leap in production, they don't make this trade. That's why I think it says something about Harley. Same reason they were trying to get in on the Burns trade as well.I agree with everything but the last sentence. I think the value Nill gave up has much more to do with his importance placed on right-shot defenders than them not valuing or being low/lower on Harley. My guess is he views both Harley and Lundkvist as integral parts of a successful season. They have no puck movers behind Heiskanen if those two struggle.
I just don't think the trade really says anything about Harley especially since this is the 2nd summer in Nill's tenure that he went RD crazy.
The D is going to be very interesting. Rolling out two guys who are still essentially rookies is very un-Nill like for the defense.I like it, based on what I have read of his potential. Is the first a bit steep? Maybe but if a bottom feeder offered a second, which could turn out to be pick 33-40 they had to offer what they thought was going to be a low first. Basically, instead of waiting 3-4 years for a young talent to develop (if they do) they jumpstart the process of redeveloping the D with more certainty than a draft pick (key word, more...not guaranteed)
The D was going to be crap, and still may be, but I feel a little better about it. Nill has a shortage of NHL ready D prospects and actual quality NHL D men. It was a pretty big need and I am sure NYR saw that as well. He paid a price for a young up and comer vs. a proven vet, which we would have also complained about.
I feel like the D will be shaky until at least Xmas and then get better as they get acclimated. Add in Grush and Bich over the next two years and we see what the Stars D of the future will look like.
Price seems a bit high. I guess Nill really wanted someone who can transition the puck on every d pair.