About as good as the 18 other guys on the ice
He was better than the goaltender who didn't feel like competing anymore in the 2nd period, that's for sure.
About as good as the 18 other guys on the ice
How'd he look last night to you? How many goals against was he on the ice for again? They f***ed up and wasted way too much money and term on a very limited depth player. That's simple truth.
Avoiding the question is weak. He was on ice for at least 3 goals, including two that he directly had turnovers on. Derp.About as good as the 18 other guys on the ice
Hard to play goal when your defense is letting players establish position in front all night. Even harder when they're not clearing pucks and actively turning it over to allow sustained pressure. But we'll all get there eventually.He was better than the goaltender who didn't feel like competing anymore in the 2nd period, that's for sure.
He was on ice for at least 3 goals, and looked brutal. He let guys sit in front without a clear out, even though I was told he was physical? He also had a bad clearing attempt up the middle that got picked and ended up in the back of the net. So you want to avoid questions and say others were bad, that's fine because it's true, but lets not ignore his role in that debacle. Because his fingerprints were all over that loss.So now your argument is coming down to how he looked last night?
He was -2.
Carlo and Lohrei both -3. But they didn't kick anyone's ass for a bad hit.
The simple truth is that his contract can at some point be moved, Lindholm and Sayman's contract are really killing this teams chance of roster moves and stuck with them for a very long time.How'd he look last night to you? How many goals against was he on the ice for again? They f***ed up and wasted way too much money and term on a very limited depth player. That's simple truth.
Goaltender, is that what itis called, I prefer 66-million-dollar POUTER!!He was better than the goaltender who didn't feel like competing anymore in the 2nd period, that's for sure.
You asked how he looked last night and I answered. Did I need to elaborate that everybody sucked ass? As far as how many goals he was on the ice for, idk I didn't go back and count but he's -2 so at least a couple but Carlo and Lohrei were both -3 so by that metric they were worse, Carlo especially. Also was only credited with one giveaway last night (Pasta led the pack with 5, followed by Wotherspoon, Osterle and Carlo with 2) so not sure how he could of had two turnovers that led to goals.Avoiding the question is weak. He was on ice for at least 3 goals, including two that he directly had turnovers on. Derp.
Hard to play goal when your defense is letting players establish position in front all night. Even harder when they're not clearing pucks and actively turning it over to allow sustained pressure. But we'll all get there eventually.
He was on ice for at least 3 goals, and looked brutal. He let guys sit in front without a clear out, even though I was told he was physical? He also had a bad clearing attempt up the middle that got picked and ended up in the back of the net. So you want to avoid questions and say others were bad, that's fine because it's true, but lets not ignore his role in that debacle. Because his fingerprints were all over that loss.
Goaltender, is that what itis called, I prefer 66-million-dollar POUTER!!
Hard to play goal when your defense is letting players establish position in front all night. Even harder when they're not clearing pucks and actively turning it over to allow sustained pressure. But we'll all get there eventually.
swayman got beat short side high a few times - maybe you tip your hat on 1 of them but you're right that he hasn't been closeMost of the goals scored last night, Swayman of last year stops. At least half of them were goals from transition, including a one handed goal off the rush.
Swayman isn't paid what he's paid to just stop the easy shots. The best players on the team are playing widely inconsistent hockey from game to game and Swayman is one of them.
I pretty much disagree with everything.Zads is feeling awfully slow and timid to me playing with not a lot of interest. He just feels soft and not all in.
Something I didn’t expect to see since he was a dude I lobbied for us to sign
There is no snarl to his game like he had in Vancouver and is soft and tender when he should be playing big and tough and mean as F****
You summed it up well.I pretty much disagree with everything.
I think he's a good skater.
I don't think he has a lack of interest. Rather he's one of the most invested players.
He's far from soft.
His problem is what it's always been: he makes bad decisions.
Chases big hits that put him out of position, reads the wrong guy, etc.
Followed the lead of the captain.He was better than the goaltender who didn't feel like competing anymore in the 2nd period, that's for sure.
Followed the lead of the captain.
About as good as the 18 other guys on the ice
I pretty much disagree with everything.
I think he's a good skater.
I don't think he has a lack of interest. Rather he's one of the most invested players.
He's far from soft.
His problem is what it's always been: he makes bad decisions.
Chases big hits that put him out of position, reads the wrong guy, etc.
And he knows who to target too. Think it was first shift he absolutely buried Keller. We haven't had anyone who locks in on the best/leader of the opposition like that since Chara.Love that he goes for the kill shot. He's not turning down those green light hits. In fact, I think he follows through harder when given the opportunity to light someone up.
This I agree with . Two great clears on the PK at the end of the game . A player that can be a great asset . Just needs not to try and do to much .Strong game in Detroit
That’s the guy I wanted