About as good as the 18 other guys on the ice
He was better than the goaltender who didn't feel like competing anymore in the 2nd period, that's for sure.
About as good as the 18 other guys on the ice
How'd he look last night to you? How many goals against was he on the ice for again? They f***ed up and wasted way too much money and term on a very limited depth player. That's simple truth.
Avoiding the question is weak. He was on ice for at least 3 goals, including two that he directly had turnovers on. Derp.About as good as the 18 other guys on the ice
Hard to play goal when your defense is letting players establish position in front all night. Even harder when they're not clearing pucks and actively turning it over to allow sustained pressure. But we'll all get there eventually.He was better than the goaltender who didn't feel like competing anymore in the 2nd period, that's for sure.
He was on ice for at least 3 goals, and looked brutal. He let guys sit in front without a clear out, even though I was told he was physical? He also had a bad clearing attempt up the middle that got picked and ended up in the back of the net. So you want to avoid questions and say others were bad, that's fine because it's true, but lets not ignore his role in that debacle. Because his fingerprints were all over that loss.So now your argument is coming down to how he looked last night?
He was -2.
Carlo and Lohrei both -3. But they didn't kick anyone's ass for a bad hit.
The simple truth is that his contract can at some point be moved, Lindholm and Sayman's contract are really killing this teams chance of roster moves and stuck with them for a very long time.How'd he look last night to you? How many goals against was he on the ice for again? They f***ed up and wasted way too much money and term on a very limited depth player. That's simple truth.
Goaltender, is that what itis called, I prefer 66-million-dollar POUTER!!He was better than the goaltender who didn't feel like competing anymore in the 2nd period, that's for sure.
You asked how he looked last night and I answered. Did I need to elaborate that everybody sucked ass? As far as how many goals he was on the ice for, idk I didn't go back and count but he's -2 so at least a couple but Carlo and Lohrei were both -3 so by that metric they were worse, Carlo especially. Also was only credited with one giveaway last night (Pasta led the pack with 5, followed by Wotherspoon, Osterle and Carlo with 2) so not sure how he could of had two turnovers that led to goals.Avoiding the question is weak. He was on ice for at least 3 goals, including two that he directly had turnovers on. Derp.
Hard to play goal when your defense is letting players establish position in front all night. Even harder when they're not clearing pucks and actively turning it over to allow sustained pressure. But we'll all get there eventually.
He was on ice for at least 3 goals, and looked brutal. He let guys sit in front without a clear out, even though I was told he was physical? He also had a bad clearing attempt up the middle that got picked and ended up in the back of the net. So you want to avoid questions and say others were bad, that's fine because it's true, but lets not ignore his role in that debacle. Because his fingerprints were all over that loss.
Goaltender, is that what itis called, I prefer 66-million-dollar POUTER!!
Hard to play goal when your defense is letting players establish position in front all night. Even harder when they're not clearing pucks and actively turning it over to allow sustained pressure. But we'll all get there eventually.