Bronxxx
Registered User
- Dec 2, 2018
- 274
- 239
According to NHL.com no one has more 1st stars of the week to today. Same is true for 2nd star of the week. This is an excellent barometer for the Hart.
MacKinnon intangibly lead his team to third in the division so that's gotta get some consideration and lost some faceoffs because the fact that he takes faceoffs automatically makes him better, plus he's a nice boy that's waited patiently and is from the same hometown as Crosby.Seriously, anyone who thinks the Art Ross winner will not also get the Hart trophy is delusional.
There’s zero argument to give one trophy to player A and the other to player B. This year the winner takes it all
No. As a lightning fan I believe MacKinnon has a legitimate shot. It can go either way.There are people here who think that if Mack wins the hart it’s because the voters are all HF-style internet haters. And I think that’s funny
my post certainly doesn’t refer to you; I thoroughly agree with everything you wroteNo. As a lightning fan I believe MacKinnon has a legitimate shot. It can go either way.
The problem myself and a lot of lightning fans have is that (I'm sure Edmonton fans can relate), is that when X player is leading, statistics come flying out of the ass to discredit that player. Equal measures aren't used.
This thread has people claiming there's an East coast bias, empty net points shouldn't count, PP points help him, too many secondary assists, and now because he isn't scoring with X amount of time on the clock when the score is a certain stat line.
Additionally, a poster the other day said on the very same day MacKinnon went pointless, that Kucherov going pointless helps MacKinnon. Lol.
MacKinnon has a legit shot, but it's not for these cherry picked, 3 IQ arguments people are making fudging stats and logic.
Yeah, I'm just highlighting that it's not the fact that we think he doesn't have a shot. We just don't think these reasons are logical.my post certainly doesn’t refer to you; I thoroughly agree with everything you wrote
… assuming we’re talking about arguments made by both fanbases. Everyone’s been in the weeds
He isn't lucky enough to play the mighty and feared sharks,ducks, and coyotes multiple times a year. Must be tough to not put up a lot of points against cupcakes like thatLol and he's back with more crayons and charts in his post. Still trying to lead people to believe Kucherov doesn't score against tough opponents. Delusional.
Nick kuche from Canada . He has a higher ppg at 5v5 and more pp points then mack.The best part about posting in this thread is not caring at all who wins the hart.
Hes the 2nd or 3rd best player since 17/18MacGinnon. Always runner up. Never a winner.
He's the Claude Giroux of his generation. Nothing wrong with being a fine player. But can't keep up with the big boys.
Hes the 2nd or 3rd best player since 17/18
Kucherov is marginally better this year while Mackinnon was significantly better last year
Giroux wasnt anywhere near as consistent as Mackinnon or as impactful at his peak outside of maybe 2012
Mackinnon has 4 years better than Girpux 2012 (2018, 2020, 2023, and 2024)
Naw I give kucherov the slight edgeMacKinnon is better this year.
He isn't lucky enough to play the mighty and feared sharks,ducks, and coyotes multiple times a year. Must be tough to not put up a lot of points against cupcakes like that
Buffalo and Mtl Look like cup contenders compared to those dominant franchises.