Ozmodiar
Registered User
- Oct 18, 2017
- 6,441
- 7,824
More like dumpster truck driver.Good think he isn't playing under MT then who was always the Bus Driver.
I think you should prepare to be disappointed if you expect Dach to take the 1C spot away from Suzuki. I don’t see that as being a realistic possibility. I like Dach, but he’s not as good as Suzuki and I don’t think he can be with that shot.
Ok.... but just imagine for a moment you are wrong (and it is still a possibility), just imagine what it would mean for this team if Dach manage to steal that 1C, what a 1-2 punch it would be then.
Nah no points in two games now.
Bad Take line I think we have a winnerNot bad for a 2C, a disappointment (CC) & the worst 1OA pick ever...
The Bad Take line strikes again lol
A healthy Koivu was better than Suzuki. Easily.I don't think people really get just how good Suzuki has been this year, but it would be truly insane for Dach to pass Suzuki on the depth chart. Its kind of been masked because of the quality of the team, his usage and 5v5 production, but overall he's been a no doubt #1 C this season. And not an ideally 2C type like Plekanec, Danault or Koivu were at the top of their games, but a true #1, top 15-20 C in the NHL. Less so in the first half, but he's been playing at a top-10 C level since the All-Star break.
I'm high on Dach's upside, but I have a hard time imagining him having the same upside as Suzuki (really high) upside with his shot and injury history.
A healthy Koivu was better than Suzuki. Easily.
You are not remembering Koivu before his knee injury, he was amazing for that short time.I don't think 50 games is enough to really say that about Koivu. That's about the amount of time he's been healthy and playing at his best. Post-knee injury Koivu is not better than Suzuki, nevermind easily. Suzuki is the smarter player, more versatile and where he's leaps and bounds better is defensively. Koivu was not good in his own zone and an at times a disaster post lockout. I would take Suzuki comfortably.
I can't say I agree. I think Saku was a very good #2C with good leadership qualities and the heart of a lion.A healthy Koivu was better than Suzuki. Easily.
He was amazing early on but no way in hell was he "easily" better.You are not remembering Koivu before his knee injury, he was amazing for that short time.
There were a lot of names thrown out there last summer as being far superior to Nick Suzuki.To be honest, with the way guys like Kucherov, Mackinnon, McDavid, etc are aging, this new era seems geared towards high end players peaking in their late 20's compared to their early 20's like the 05' lockout to COVID era. Conditioning was already a thing in the mid-00's so it can't be only that, but I would guess the lessened physicality of the game is allowing guys to have longer primes.
I could see Nick still reaching an even higher level next year. He's one of those cerebral players who thinks the game the right way and tries new things.
Haha love this post in here!Not bad for a 2C, a disappointment (CC) & the worst 1OA pick ever...
The Bad Take line strikes again lol
50 is rich but I did say he had a 40G shot on draft day. Hes always had that ridiculous shot. Its crazy how good it is. He couldve made a career of just being a triggerman. Hes getting very confident in his shot now, and teams are noticing. Its incredibly hard to cover a guy that can beat you in every way at this high of a level.If Suzuki continues this upward growth, with Slaf and CC getting better also, I honestly think 50 goals from Suzuki isn’t out of the realm of possibility. His shot is ridiculous.