Player Discussion Nick Suzuki Game Winning Goals Edition

  • We sincerely apologize for the extended downtime. Our hosting provider, XenForo Cloud, encountered a major issue with their backup system, which unfortunately resulted in the loss of some critical data from the past year.

    What This Means for You:

    • If you created an account after March 2024, it no longer exists. You will need to sign up again to access the forum.
    • If you registered before March 2024 but changed your email, username, or password in the past year, those changes were lost. You’ll need to update your account details manually once you're logged in.
    • Threads and posts created within the last year have been restored.

    Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.

    In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord Server
Three legged Nick!
1736782238436.jpeg
 
Big dick Nick is a PPG player already but do you guys think he'll ever have 90+ point seasons? Or at least one. Doesn't seem so far-fetched anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Habssince89
+7 and climbing.
He's not Danault but he's smart enough to know it's a battle he has to win for this team to be successful.
Feel free to come at me with the argument that +/- is meaningless and I'll laugh in your face.
Which team has been successful without a #1 center on the positive side and significantly so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Redux91
I heard Suzuki tied Saku Koivu with a record of 11 straight games with at least a point on home ice.
He seems to be a fairly consistent Lad. :popcorn:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benstheman
+7 and climbing.
He's not Danault but he's smart enough to know it's a battle he has to win for this team to be successful.
Feel free to come at me with the argument that +/- is meaningless and I'll laugh in your face.
Which team has been successful without a #1 center on the positive side and significantly so.
Your actual question is which team has been successful without scoring more at even strength than the other team, which is a pretty funny question when you think about it.
 
Your actual question is which team has been successful without scoring more at even strength than the other team, which is a pretty funny question when you think about it.
There is nothing funny about it I'm referring to top contending teams in any given season. There isn't one who don't have a top line dominate the even strength situation. What I find funny is people who don't think the +/- is a worthwhile stat in a sport where scoring more is the only way to win.
 
+7 and climbing.
He's not Danault but he's smart enough to know it's a battle he has to win for this team to be successful.
Feel free to come at me with the argument that +/- is meaningless and I'll laugh in your face.
Which team has been successful without a #1 center on the positive side and significantly so.
the stat is meaningless when comparing players playing on different teams. For players on the same team, the stat is a lot easier to contextualize and make sense of.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Habssince89

Ad

Ad