Confirmed with Link: Nick Schultz to Columbus for 5th Round Draft Pick

major major

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
14,598
1,669
Nick Schultz is solid. -11 on the oilers isn't bad. Lol

Actually Schultz has been bad even for the Oilers. I follow their blogs and he's third pair bordering on out of the top-6. There's a chance Schultz could turn his game around, but as is Golo is easily a better player. But Richards like his vets...
 

Jackets16

Registered User
Jan 7, 2005
12,018
619
Actually Schultz has been bad even for the Oilers. I follow their blogs and he's third pair bordering on out of the top-6. There's a chance Schultz could turn his game around, but as is Golo is easily a better player. But Richards like his vets...

That's the key though. Richards won't play Goloubef or Erixon. He'd rather play Johnson 30+ minutes.
 

pete goegan

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 6, 2006
13,020
350
Washington, DC
That's the key though. Richards won't play Goloubef or Erixon. He'd rather play Johnson 30+ minutes.

With Tyutin out, who is Johnson's partner? Who pairs regularly with the other two vets on defense, Wiz and Niki6? Who is on a line with Horton? Isn't Richards icing one of the youngest teams in the league? Yet, "Richards likes his vets..."

I don't understand the obsession with Goloubef and Erixon.
 

major major

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
14,598
1,669
With Tyutin out, who is Johnson's partner? Who pairs regularly with the other two vets on defense, Wiz and Niki6? Who is on a line with Horton? Isn't Richards icing one of the youngest teams in the league? Yet, "Richards likes his vets..."

I don't understand the obsession with Goloubef and Erixon.

Fair enough that Richards has trusted the youth a lot. But I stand by my assessment that Golo and Erixon are easily better than Nick Schultz.
 

BJFan1

Registered User
Feb 6, 2008
449
0
Columbus
Fair enough that Richards has trusted the youth a lot. But I stand by my assessment that Golo and Erixon are easily better than Nick Schultz.

Methinks Murray is going to be out a little more than "day to day" as we were told and Tyutin is going to have a "setback" announced in his high ankle sprain and put him out 3-4 weeks more.

Looks like they wanted to have some defensive depth more than Erixon/Golo with more NHL experience. Only reason this makes sense to me.
 

pete goegan

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 6, 2006
13,020
350
Washington, DC
...But I stand by my assessment that Golo and Erixon are easily better than Nick Schultz.

They well may be, but I have no way of knowing that, since I have seen little or nothing of them! On what is your assessment based? Did you like what you saw in camp? Have you seen something of them in Springfield? From what does your certainty arise? I just don't get it.
 

major major

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
14,598
1,669
They well may be, but I have no way of knowing that, since I have seen little or nothing of them! On what is your assessment based? Did you like what you saw in camp? Have you seen something of them in Springfield? From what does your certainty arise? I just don't get it.

Camp? Golo has played in 15 or so NHL games and Erixon in 50. Just last night we watched Golo, remember? He was solid positionally and made good passes, as usual.
 

The Jones Zone

Registered User
Nov 27, 2013
6,082
2,521
Raleigh, NC
It is what it is. I remember when We got Foote from Colorado. I realize he was playing against the other teams top line, but all I recall from his days in Columbus is him watching the puck go in the net behind him.


We'll know how we done a month, no use having a stroke over today.
 

pete goegan

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 6, 2006
13,020
350
Washington, DC
Camp? Golo has played in 15 or so NHL games and Erixon in 50. Just last night we watched Golo, remember? He was solid positionally and made good passes, as usual.

Yes, I remember last night, my impression was much better of Sevard and Prout. I'm not implying that Goloubef and Erixon do not have potential, I just don't see where they have demonstrated so much to sustain a constant drumbeat for their insertion into the lineup.

This has wandered way off topic, so I'll drop it.
 

BJFan1

Registered User
Feb 6, 2008
449
0
Columbus
Yes, I remember last night, my impression was much better of Sevard and Prout. I'm not implying that Goloubef and Erixon do not have potential, I just don't see where they have demonstrated so much to sustain a constant drumbeat for their insertion into the lineup.

This has wandered way off topic, so I'll drop it.

Probably should be noted... I saw some stuff out there today that Erixon is hurt, so if we're down Tyutin, Murray, and Erixon (on depth), then picking up a guy to play 3rd pairing probably isn't a bad idea, regardless of how good Savard/Prout are vs. Golo/Erixon.
 

BJFan1

Registered User
Feb 6, 2008
449
0
Columbus
Asked for fair assessment on Shultz from EDM board (wasn't expecting much), but I did get this response, for what it's worth....

Look for a semi-reliable bottom pairing d-man. Forces a lot of plays through players, and is known to giveaway the puck A LOT when facing anyone above the 3rd line.

Decent on the PK, sometimes. Yes, only sometimes.


Tl;Dr - Can handle the 6th man role, but don't expect much.

:scared: :dunno:
 

Xoggz22

Registered User
Mar 4, 2002
7,930
3,474
Columbus, Ohio
Veteran presence with some playoff experience. He's a 6/7 guy when CBJ is healthy and the asset we gave up means little. Simply a depth move that could help settle our back end a little in the short term. I hope so anyway.
 

jackets4life

Registered User
Jan 16, 2013
1,660
9
Section 203
Good trade, probably will serve as a good rental for us and then be on his merry way. Maybe he impresses and we try to sign him. Either way, for a 5th I like this.
 

major major

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
14,598
1,669
Veteran presence with some playoff experience. He's a 6/7 guy when CBJ is healthy and the asset we gave up means little. Simply a depth move that could help settle our back end a little in the short term. I hope so anyway.

I think he'll need to step up his game to be a 6/7 for us. Edmonton fans didn't think he was good enough to be their 6/7.
 

Jackets16

Registered User
Jan 7, 2005
12,018
619
I think he'll need to step up his game to be a 6/7 for us. Edmonton fans didn't think he was good enough to be their 6/7.

I wouldn't worry too much about what Edmonton fans think. I'll wait until I see him play with our team.
 

CBJWerenski8

Rest in Peace Johnny
Jun 13, 2009
43,696
26,737
I wouldn't worry too much about what Edmonton fans think. I'll wait until I see him play with our team.

IVe learned to stop trusting what other teams fans say of their departing players after the Jack Johnson debacle by some LA fans.
 

MFRONE

Registered User
Feb 3, 2005
12,990
1,588
Columbus, Ohio
Murray is now out for at least a week and probably more per Jarmo. Tyutin couldn't even skate because of too much pain in his ankle.

So glad the best help Jarmo bothered to find was a 6/7 dman from the worse defense in the league.
 

Jbcraig1883

Registered User
Mar 31, 2002
5,319
649
Virginia
Wild fan here so have not seen him with Edmonton...

Schultz was a good 3/4th mobile defenseman prior to his last year with the Wild. He closed gaps fairly well, was good at blocking shots, and had a good stick in lanes. He never developed any offense or any ability to handle the puck since he came up with the Wild under Lemaire. If he still has his mobility and plays in a more structured system than Edmonton, I think he will be a fine pickup for the third pairing and PK considering you only gave up a 5th round pick.
 

Robert

Foligno family
Mar 9, 2006
36,576
1,673
Louisville, KY
Wild fan here so have not seen him with Edmonton...

Schultz was a good 3/4th mobile defenseman prior to his last year with the Wild. He closed gaps fairly well, was good at blocking shots, and had a good stick in lanes. He never developed any offense or any ability to handle the puck since he came up with the Wild under Lemaire. If he still has his mobility and plays in a more structured system than Edmonton, I think he will be a fine pickup for the third pairing and PK considering you only gave up a 5th round pick.

That does help, the only problem he's almost as old as me!!! :sarcasm:
 

Sore Loser

Sorest of them all
Dec 9, 2006
7,622
1,220
Spokane, WA.
I love this pickup, personally ... especially at the price.

Everyone was moaning and griping about needing another veteran on defense, and we got a pretty capable defensive defender, for only a late round pick. I think Schultz is better than Nikitin - definitely in his own end.

The trade gets made? I see some sour comments! There really is no pleasing some of you, is there? ;)
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad