No, LTIR is not a double dip. LTIR will ensure that any move at the deadline has to be 'cap hit in = cap hit out'.
feels like a similar desperation attempt to fill in the blanks like last year if im not going crazyinstead of getting one or two good forwards, Dubas is trying to get a bunch of flawed ones who have the potential to be good. I'm not sure I really agree with that approach, but we'll see how it goes. As of now there are only four forwards who you can say belong in a contending team's top 6, which is worse than last year
How is the forward group more top heavy?
Top 4 is the same top 4, everyone else is low paid.
Salary cap issues or not, in a vaccum the Hyman and Foligno deals are poor and I don't think Dubas would have signed those deals anyways.If the salary cap wasn't the driving force behind these moves Leafs could have ...
Hyman -- Matthews -- Marner
Foligno -- Tavares --- Nylander
Galchenyuk -- Kerfoot -- Mikheyev
minus the loss of Zach Hyman for the #1LW spot filled by Ritchie now.
If the salary cap wasn't the driving force behind these moves Leafs could have ...
Hyman -- Matthews -- Marner
Foligno -- Tavares --- Nylander
Galchenyuk -- Kerfoot -- Mikheyev
(our playoff roster) & now
Ritchie -- Matthews -- Marner
Bunting -- Tavares -- Nylander
Mikeyev -- Kampf --- Kerfoot
4th line remains status quo with Spezza, Simmonds, Engval/Brooks and only missing Thornton (replaced by Gabriel).
Which top 9 would one prefer believing it gives the Leafs best chance of winning a playoff round?
Not if we're talking about Mess' scenario about activating Kase from LTIR for the playoffs.
Hyman is significantly better than anyone we signed.
Our forward group isn't good as a whole, it's just not.
yeah basically it's the same idea. Granted, these are all better bets than the ones he made last time. But at the same time, he's down a top 6 forward and the Leafs are in a tougher division. It probably would have been better to go with a different approach than the one that just failedfeels like a similar desperation attempt to fill in the blanks like last year if im not going crazy
“Elementary, my dear Watson, precisely, the game is afoot'"
I didn't Sherlock Holmes my plan on my own, I Kucherov'd it from Tampa Bay's Cup winning tactic.
I agree with the overall premise, but I still utterly reject that Hyman was the one guy doing this for us. That's simply not true.
Hyman will be missed, I've always felt he's been underrated here; he'll thrive in Edmonton.Hyman is significantly better than anyone we signed.
Our forward group isn't good as a whole, it's just not.
yeah basically it's the same idea. Granted, these are all better bets than the ones he made last time. But at the same time, he's down a top 6 forward and the Leafs are in a tougher division. It probably would have been better to go with a different approach than the one that just failed
. Forward lines aren't as good as they were last playoffs but I think they are better than last year when the season started.
I wouldn't be that conclusive about it - guys like Bunting and Kase and Robertson could quite easily upgrade the forward group overall without even doing anything too surprising.
But sure, given their lack of track records, as of now we have to say the forward group looks marginally worse with the loss of Hyman.
Yeah that really sucked to have a crippled Foligno, I was kind of thinking of with Tavares in the minutes we had him :/Well the playoff lines didn't include Tavares, and the clearly injured foligno played only half the games.
Not, unless they hang onto the puck like Hyman did and dont pass it everIf you hated Hyman playing with 16 and 34, I'm thinking you are going to hate who ever plays with them this year even more.
feels like a similar desperation attempt to fill in the blanks like last year if im not going crazy
From where we ended;
Kampf needs to be better than Thornton (should be easy)
Ritchie needs to be better than Foligno (should be easy)
Kase needs to be better than Engvall (a guarantee and big upgrade if Kase stays healthy - and we still have Engvall right now anyway)
Bunting needs to be better than Hyman. (massive shoes to fill. I think Bunting can match the offensive production on the top line, if he plays there. I think Kampf will replace the defensive/PK role of Hyman. - essentially filling Hyman's role by committee)
Boston ended the relationship.Maybe Ritchie didn't want to be there ?
Not always the teams decision.
No, because they play a very different game and arent currently injured.
Thornton was an offensive playmaker that was never fast, overly physical or great defensively. Vesey was always 10 ply charmin soft and had some offensive flare that obviously didnt work here, and Foligno was injured so we never got the Foligno we paid for.
Bunting if he fails offensively still is an agitating pest that can be moved down to the bottom 6. Ritchie, even though Im not a huge fan, has been a quality NHLer and will play that physical game and Kampf is what he is, an offensive black hole who will PK and win some faceoffs.
The expectations arent unreasonable for any of the 3 and they just have a much higher floor than any of the previously mentioned players.