i mean that is $1.5m in dead cap for two years on a team gasping for cap space on a signing that is only 30 games old, but ok.
Don't be disingenuous. Hes not a "main" piece, he's a roster player going the other way in a trade due to cap implications. That's like a standard piece in most trades, the value is in the other components.
Funny watching Bruins fans come in here on their high horse.Leafs fans this summer telling Bruins fans how successful he was going to be in his role with them and not wanting to listen to us when we said he’d mostly do nothing>>>>>
and I kinda liked him because he’d occasionally get angry and be a force. But god damn nobody has ever left me wanting more than him. He’s clearly got decent hands. He can be a physical monster. Just has no interest bringing it night in and night out
By my count, 30 different veteran players with a cap hit >= $2 mil were waived over the past 365 days. Just 1 was claimed: Sami Vatanen on an expiring deal.
Not almost, it is unusable on a phone.Why’d they sign this guy? Never really made much sense to me. But I’m not an expert with this particular team..
Also, what in the actual f*** is going on with the ads on mobile? Holy shit. My screen re-sizes constantly because of stupid ads. The site is almost unusable on my phone.
I can't believe that not every single forward signing last offseason has worked out, only Spezza, Bunting, Kase, Kampf and Simmonds. Meanwhile Ritchie sucks, this is a disaster!
They cover what makes them money. 5 articles about Nick Ritchie signing in Toronto will make them more money then 10 about a better player signing in the south. That is just reality.but if the amount of sportsnet coverage a signing gets is irrelevant to how important it is, that must mean that toronto is not the centre of the universe?
that is heresy. are you some kind of hockey copernicus?
so you also think waiving ritchie is a "no lose" situation? or is there perhaps some loss to waiving "minor signing" nick ritchie 30 years into his leafs career after a "low profile" signing this summer to a two year $2.5m deal that makes him better paid than any of the players you just named?
i mean there's reality, and then there is being a leafs fan.
I think Rielly kinda helped solve that problem with his cheap hometown discount.The real shame will be when his salary costs the Leafs their best goalie in years in the offseason…
there's no loss to waiving him, I'm glad the team isn't afraid to potentially cut bait on a sunk cost. The loss was originally signing him obviously. That was a mistake. But when you make a bunch of bets in the offseason, not all of them will hit. And this is a pretty minor misstep in the grand scheme of things.
Don't be disingenuous. Hes not a "main" piece, he's a roster player going the other way in a trade due to cap implications. That's like a standard piece in most trades, the value is in the other components.
There is a good chance Ritche, Dermott and Mrazek need to go, plus we need to get Sandin for 1.5 or less, Mikheyev for 1.7 or less, resign Spezza for league min, Kase for 1.5 or less, bring up Robertson and that leaves a max of 6.5 for Campbell
small news, not big news,
most likely, he'll clear, and Leafs will assign to Taxi, until needed
I think Rielly kinda helped solve that problem with his cheap hometown discount.
Please god no, Pitlick is actually serviceable in his own end doesnt have another year on his dealPitlick for Ritchie
If he gets sent down I think it shaves like 1.25M off the cap hit.if he clears waivers is he off the books?
Edmonton can waive him.And yet TML fans are in every Koskinen thread claiming i will cost a first to dump 4 months of Koskinen contract