Hagel gets a lot of flack but he had a big hand in that OT Point goal.What a pickup, knew he'd pay dividends. Hagel on the other hand
Hagel gets a lot of flack but he had a big hand in that OT Point goal.
Anybody still think we lost that trade with Ottawa tho? JFBB
No, just because we don't need draft picks we need cost-controlled players who can contribute now. Cirelli leaves a hole in the lineup. If this was summer 23 and we knew we could not keep Cirelli maybe then yes.Would you trade Cirelli for Ottawa's 7th overall, if it meant you could re-sign Paul for 4 or 5 years at an affordable caphit, one that comes in well below what Cirelli is, and will, be paid
Tied for 5th on the team with 4 points, and less than 15:00 toi? Also his speed on the forecheck causes trouble for the other teams defenseman. I’m happy with his contribution, frankly. He’s out scoring goodrow/Coleman.In a 7 game series even a blind squirrel will find a nut.
He’s been unremarkable, which is better than being bad I guess
I mean that squirrel finding 2 nuts in a game 7 is a pretty damn good squirrel!In a 7 game series even a blind squirrel will find a nut.
He’s been unremarkable, which is better than being bad I guess
Does losing Paul not leave a hole? He played 22 minutes last night.No, just because we don't need draft picks we need cost-controlled players who can contribute now. Cirelli leaves a hole in the lineup. If this was summer 23 and we knew we could not keep Cirelli maybe then yes.
Tied for 5th on the team with 4 points, and less than 15:00 toi? Also his speed on the forecheck causes trouble for the other teams defenseman. I’m happy with his contribution, frankly. He’s out scoring goodrow/Coleman.
I mean that squirrel finding 2 nuts in a game 7 is a pretty damn good squirrel!
Agreed. He's replaced Coleman in my books. Hagel has a ways to go as far as contributing off the score sheet to equal Goodrow. Cirelli in games 6 and 7 was about as close to Gourde as it gets. Just not as fast...Tied for 5th on the team with 4 points, and less than 15:00 toi? Also his speed on the forecheck causes trouble for the other teams defenseman. I’m happy with his contribution, frankly. He’s out scoring goodrow/Coleman.
Damn what a stud 2 goals in game 7 in Toronto!!
Imagine. Lol. My gosh.We need to get Gourde back and put him with this guy. I'm dead f***ing serious
I've been saying that since the regular season lol. It would be incredible.We need to get Gourde back and put him with this guy. I'm dead f***ing serious
Question for Tampa fans.
Would you trade Cirelli for Ottawa's 7th overall, if it meant you could re-sign Paul for 4 or 5 years at an affordable caphit, one that comes in well below what Cirelli is, and will, be paid
Question for Tampa fans.
Would you trade Cirelli for Ottawa's 7th overall, if it meant you could re-sign Paul for 4 or 5 years at an affordable caphit, one that comes in well below what Cirelli is, and will, be paid
No. Cirelli is worth more than one first. The rest is irrelevant because it doesn't affect Cirelli's value on the market.
The question was, is cirelli worth a first and the space to keep Paul to play in his spot.
If Paul's playing 22 minutes and scoring 2 goals in game 7, at a much cheaper hit, then it's something to consider.
IF cirelli were to be traded, this summer is the best time and you wouldn't want to do it without knowing what his replacement is.
He's paid 7 million in real salary and teams know that Tampa will be hard pressed to keep him.Repeating yourself doesn't make the irrelevant part less irrelevant. For symmetry, I'll repeat myself: No. Cirelli is worth more than one first. The rest is irrelevant because it doesn't affect Cirelli's value on the market.
If your proposal is a good bit more than Ottawa's pick, then maybe worth it. And yes, we wouldn't just trade a guy in a vacuum -- we'd consider what it does up and down the lineup. Moving Cirelli is one way to keep Paul, but certainly not the only one. Without knowing what Paul is going to demand, can't really say what other moves make sense.