g00n
Retired Global Mod
- Nov 22, 2007
- 31,265
- 15,865
For the first time since the Young Guns I'm pretty interested in our prospect pool. I don't think we're going to tank for very long, if at all.
Straight offense, No Chaser defense.It's PIT v WSH in the battle of Man-Games-Lost.
While PIT did great to jettison dead weight of Petry/Granlund/DeSmith, they're still in just as precarious a position as us
They need everything to go right to make the Playoffs with shitty depth, questionable D, and questionable G
Are they gonna be able to win old-school Smythe Division 6-5 games all year?
seems murky. and ponderous. and mellifluous. and melodius. and felonious. and thelonius monkius.
I tend to agree, and I think it's a matter of approach. Pitt is going all in now with the expectation of an extended rebuild after and the Caps are aiming for a softer landing and managing the unique factor of the chase for 895.For the first time since the Young Guns I'm pretty interested in our prospect pool. I don't think we're going to tank for very long, if at all.
I agree but they need to figure out the center position. McMichael and Lapierre look like they could be future middle six centers but it’s hard to find that dominant, high-end 1C. You normally have to draft them high in the first round.For the first time since the Young Guns I'm pretty interested in our prospect pool. I don't think we're going to tank for very long, if at all.
Maybe they're happy with Strome and expect him to develop even more.I agree but they need to figure out the center position. McMichael and Lapierre look like they could be future middle six centers but it’s hard to find that dominant, high-end 1C. You normally have to draft them high in the first round.
Well… that would be a little unwise.Maybe they're happy with Strome and expect him to develop even more.
I used the "significant" caveat because I didn't want some poster running up to quote me after the Capitals sign Max Comtois or Adam Erne or some other NHL/AHL tweener to a PTO with a "see see, I told you they weren't done!"
If they do something with the cap space they would get from trading Mantha (or they offload him for a real gain, rather than being forced to pay to eliminate his contract), that would indeed be significant. But who do you think is a mystery buyer for Mantha that is left? Who suddenly is willing to eat that contract that wasn't willing to at the NHL draft? Who is even left to spend that cap space on? Patrick Kane or Jonathan Toews? The best opportunities for them to get rid of Mantha before the season starts have passed, and most of the best things players to use the cap space he would free up are now signed. Most likely scenario now is trading Mantha in the lead-up to the trade deadline, especially if Carbery can make him look like a useful asset.
I don't particularly care if GMBM is "trying" or not. General Managers aren't paid for trying. They're paid for executing a plan, and right now it seems like the Capitals plan is all about 894. They are neither swinging for another Championship now (which is a very tall ask indeed) nor are they building a bridge into the post-Ovechkin years.
What other path are they forging ahead?... aside from this being a dogshit take, what moves are you pointing to that makes this clear? Which moves or lack of moves are you pointing to that suggest the Capitals want Ovechkin to keep scoring goals but not win anymore?
Isn't treating your assets with value actually the move you make if 894 is just another milestone, instead of selling Mantha at a fat loss (or paying someone to take him) so you can overpay for somebody else, say you took a shot, and then leave the team f***ed 2-3 years from now when Ovechkin's already got the record anyway?
It's just a whiny rhetoric based on how whiny babies want to spin events.
See, and I'm way more interested in the next 5 years of Caps hockey than I would be if I were a Pittsburgh fan right now, knowing how truly grim it looks just around the corner.
What softer landing? The Capitals haven't prepared much for the post-Ovie era. In fact, they were doing quite the opposite during the Lavi years, suppressing opportunities for younger players at every chance they could (this being another area where you and I have had strong disagreements in the past, with you repeatedly defending the coaching staff and management's decisions to field veterans like Carl Hagelin). The prospect system still ranks in the bottom third in the league, and they haven't helped it by sidelining multiple high promise prospects. Heck, it's not even clear if there will be space for Sudzalev in Hershey this year.I tend to agree, and I think it's a matter of approach. Pitt is going all in now with the expectation of an extended rebuild after and the Caps are aiming for a softer landing and managing the unique factor of the chase for 895.
Well, you needn'tStraight offense, No Chaser defense.
I’ll see myself out.
Agreed. But it's going to be a challenge finding elite pieces where they won't be paying a premium based on name value to some extent. They may still be elite. Who knows. Hard to know what may become available. But the Caps mainly need to get back in the business of creating and developing names rather than poaching them after they're established. As-is the pipeline is good enough to complement some home run acquisition headliners but that's probably it. Another top 12ish pick, particularly at more of a scarce position like C/D, and maybe that's enough. Leonard's a gamer. He should carry the torch from Oshie pretty easily. Miro could be a gamer. I'm still not sure what exactly he is yet. That is IMO maybe the most interesting storyline this season...finding that out. The rest that are further out are sketchy in overall profile. They've added some upside but they're basically all wingers.If anything I’d say 1C is going to be where they make their biggest swing. Nothing good on the market right now but a lot of space for them to outbid and overpay for the right guy in the next few years.
At least, if I were GMBM I’d be relatively happy with my pieces right now and hoping I can corner a 1C/1D, in that order, before I let a lot of that cap space go to waste. Team looks drastically different with these pieces around a strong middle.
I’m rooting for Vancouver to shit the bed so that Elias Pettersson demands out and Washington nabs him somehow. That’s been my fantasy for a few years now, at least.
In this fantasy are you drinking a single plum, floating in perfume, served in a man's hat?
The “I know it better than you do” schtick is so old dude.Monitoring your posts? That's rich.
I had associated this stance with you because you went so far as to specifically quote me in a post where you took the stance of "there's still time for roster moves" back at the trade deadline. So I noticed that post, and I noticed it again when you repeated that logic in the post I quoted from this thread.
If you don't have the time to visit CapFriendly, maybe listen to others that do when they say it's unlikely the Caps make a significant move? Or at least don't straight up object to the concept?
I used the "significant" caveat because I didn't want some poster running up to quote me after the Capitals sign Max Comtois or Adam Erne or some other NHL/AHL tweener to a PTO with a "see see, I told you they weren't done!"
If they do something with the cap space they would get from trading Mantha (or they offload him for a real gain, rather than being forced to pay to eliminate his contract), that would indeed be significant. But who do you think is a mystery buyer for Mantha that is left? Who suddenly is willing to eat that contract that wasn't willing to at the NHL draft? Who is even left to spend that cap space on? Patrick Kane or Jonathan Toews? The best opportunities for them to get rid of Mantha before the season starts have passed, and most of the best things players to use the cap space he would free up are now signed. Most likely scenario now is trading Mantha in the lead-up to the trade deadline, especially if Carbery can make him look like a useful asset.
I don't particularly care if GMBM is "trying" or not. General Managers aren't paid for trying. They're paid for executing a plan, and right now it seems like the Capitals plan is all about 894. They are neither swinging for another Championship now (which is a very tall ask indeed) nor are they building a bridge into the post-Ovechkin years.
Dude. You only need to look at the structure of the cap to realize this is a flexible “prove it” year for veterans and rookies alikeWhat other path are they forging ahead?
It's plain as day as they aren't rebuilding. Folks around here love to drag up the quote about not rebuilding before Ovie retires. The biggest asset they've sold off is Orlov, and that was because it was obvious they weren't going to get a contract done. They actively refuse to clear space for younger players to develop on the roster, and have loaded up with marginal veterans instead (including this off-season). So, they're not rebuilding.
Are they contending? I don't think so. If you think their aim is to contend now, then you would also have to admit they're failing at it. They missed the playoffs (and it wasn't particularly close) last year. They haven't won a first round series since 2018. Columbus, Vancouver, and Montreal have won more playoff games than the Capitals during that stretch. Even the Flyers have won as many playoff games as the Capitals since 2018, meaning the Capitals are literally tied for last in the Metropolitan division in playoff success during that span. So we're doing a better job contending than, who, Buffalo and Ottawa? Yay?
So they're not rebuilding. They're failing at contending. So what's the framework of success you can give them? That they're treading some marginal path of a team that gets 8th overall draft picks instead of a 3rd overall? Big whoop. Their beacon of success is clearly defined by one objective, 894. And the fact that the core of this hockey team has stayed the same despite a revolving door of head coaches is evidence enough of that.
Management hasn't shaken up the core of this hockey team since they traded for TJ Oshie, all the way back in 2015. Powerplay 1 is all still here on, what is in essence, lifetime deals. They just inked Tom Wilson to join that group, as well. Letting Holtby go was as close as they've come, and the writing was on the wall there, with him losing his starting role multiple seasons in a row and being on an expiring contract (and we reached the point where he's not even in the NHL anymore, despite not officially being retired). For better or worse, they've piroritized keeping Ovechkin's teammates around over the types of meaningful change that any other franchise (or even any other time period of the Capitals) would do when faced with five straight seasons of futility.
I don't think Pittsburgh's approach would be my ideal one, but I'd rather swing for the fences than try to bail the boat out of sinking water with a bucket. This team isn't planning on really contending now. They aren't building for the future, either. They're playing for memories instead. Memories of the 2018 Cup. Memories to be made by 894.
What softer landing? The Capitals haven't prepared much for the post-Ovie era. In fact, they were doing quite the opposite during the Lavi years, suppressing opportunities for younger players at every chance they could (this being another area where you and I have had strong disagreements in the past, with you repeatedly defending the coaching staff and management's decisions to field veterans like Carl Hagelin). The prospect system still ranks in the bottom third in the league, and they haven't helped it by sidelining multiple high promise prospects. Heck, it's not even clear if there will be space for Sudzalev in Hershey this year.
The Hagelin comments were in response to Calicaps, who is also quoted in that post.Dude. You only need to look at the structure of the cap to realize this is a flexible “prove it” year for veterans and rookies alike
You should actually firmly re-examine some of what you’re saying because I’ve never been a pro -Hagelin player here. I’ve actually been vehemently anti-Hagelin especially as it relates to his usage. You should really STRONGLY reevaluate my post history there.
Dumbest analogy ever. The Caps aren’t slowly trying to cross any bridge, they are trying to get the bridge rebuilt as they approach it.I'll put it this way:
The Capitals and Penguins are both travelling down the road towards a bridge that's out. We all see it coming ahead on the road, the retirement of the Ovechkin/Crosby/Malkin-era of players (that collapsed bridge ahead). The Penguins decided to gun it as hard as they can, they want to leap over that gap at full speed. They're probably not going to make it, and will end up crashing in the ravine. But they're gunning for it. The Capitals, on the other hand, are just kinda going the same speed as always. They're not punching it, but they're also not slowing down to avoid falling off the bridge. They're going to fall off into the same ravine as the Penguins, but they won't be doing a sick Dukes of Hazard burn-out before they do.
I think my personal preference would be to slow down and try to avoid falling off, but I'd rather do what the Pens are doing than do nothing at all end up in the same place.
#UnexepectedSimpsonsIn this fantasy are you drinking a single plum, floating in perfume, served in a man's hat?
Blood pressure… rising.How in the world did we start arguing about Haglin again??? Good grief
How in the world did we start arguing about Haglin again??? Good grief