Nikolajs Sillers
Registered User
- Jan 2, 2021
- 5,142
- 3,640
This will net 2 and a half minutes to every game...this is some serious cloud yelling in this thread.
No worries everyone, they'll put this on the backburner once they find a way to make LED visors that display gambling ads
The NHL is a far ways away from NFL, NBA and MLB in terms of salaries and revenue.
Add to that what I'm assuming is increased on-demand streaming viewership where you just fast-forward all the breaks.I thought the prevailing wisdom right now was for advertising money to be dedicated to things that will be in the viewer’s field of vision while watching live play (on-equipment advertising, rink board and on-ice overlays, score bugs) because it’s becoming more and more clear that the ad breaks between play are when people aren’t actually watching the screen. They’re using their phones, they’re grabbing a snack, they’re taking a leak.
Making the in between play breaks longer just further encourages people to … walk away from their tv during a tv timeout because now they have reliably more time to do that away-from-screen thing.
I assume the NHL is all on pay tv now. The whole point of pay tv was that you paid and didn't have any commercials. It's this slow steady creep to where we are now paying to watch more and more commercials that is annoying. The high seas put out a much better product than any of these paid services. I am paying for it in the old fashioned way of seeing these commercials. Would rather not watch anything than pay for the shit they are cramming down our throats.If this happens I’ll be a lot less likely to watch games. I’d gladly trade European style jerseys for no commercials at all.
Yuval Harari makes a strong argument that we were better off (or at least more sustainable) as semi-agrarian/nomadic folks, but that’s a whole ‘nother matter. All I know is that there’s a “man” worth $400 billion wondering where all the money went. Hmm. Big mystery there.
Yuval Harari openly regards all of us peasants as "useless eaters", so his priorities might not quite match yours or mine.
Source? I think his books are brilliant and don’t even hint at that sorta thinking, but I also don’t put people on pedestals. He could be right on 95% and then have abhorrent views for the other 5%, wouldn’t be the first.
Nitpickery!--Excellent display of vocabularic acumen!Better yet, let’s just say if you can’t tell it’s offside playing the video back at game speed, then the goal stands.
I’m personally so tired of the offside nitpickery
Remove the Anthem , nobody wants to hear them every night