you were implying it was a bad strategy or just being sarcastic?
Gourde Johnson Panarin Krug Marchessault Whitecloud Pionk B.Tanev Ruuta Giordano Bozak Goodrow Dillon A.Greene Iafallo Kampny Vatrano were all undrafted as well as the aforementioned Canuck one's
Is that your criteria for a good free agent signing...that assets must be recovered before they part the organization? Stecher had a journeyman year and nothing close to fantastic. Otherwise, Detroit would have protected him or Seattle would have drafted him.
There's nothing wrong with finding undrafted FAs, but when you're signing guys who are already 23/24/25 your chances of finding NHLers is extremely slim. A lot of these success stories are playing 1-2 years of college, coming out at 20/21 and then entering an NHL system.
I think it's better to target younger undrafted UFAs, whether CHL or NCAA, in general, and to not treat 24 year old NCAA UFAs as "free picks" like they could replace the value of picks that were traded away.
Regarding criteria for a good free agent signing, my criticism is solely focused on the value chain dying on the vine. We find a few good players like Stetcher and Tanev, they provide some nice value and turn into an asset for us, and then we let them walk for absolutely nothing and can't carry any value forward. It's a longstanding trend with this organization that has bled them dry.
The fact Tampa has 2 picks before the Canucks have 2 in this draft is unbelievable.
Montreal, in the finals, came into the draft with 10 picks.
Vegas and NYI, both semi-finalists, also had 6 picks, both with higher pick value than Vancouvers.
Really, truly feels bad.