belfour30
Blackhawks Fangirl
- Dec 14, 2019
- 1,946
- 1,683
I'm sure Bobby loved Keenan.Only in Bobbys world is Torts a respected bench boss and Q (pre-Beach hoopla) isn't.
I'm sure Bobby loved Keenan.Only in Bobbys world is Torts a respected bench boss and Q (pre-Beach hoopla) isn't.
JR certainly expressed his love towards Iron Mike during his HOF speech ... but hey he was loving pretty much everyone! on that note JR's speech was refreshing in it's honesty.I'm sure Bobby loved Keenan.
He does, which is fine. But he would be a shitty coach just like Torts in todays day and age.I'm sure Bobby loved Keenan.
He does, which is fine. But he would be a shitty coach just like Torts in todays day and age.
I remember back when Roenick had a podcast, he had Eddie O on and he had said the team was revolting and won the 94 Cup in spite of KeenanHe was shitty coach thru entire 2nd half of his NHL career after 94 cup
I realize I’m gonna feel dirty for agreeing with Bobby but the Flyer announcers on air were vocal that something needed to happen.It's still bullshit he sat at all, don't try to justify it lol.
So Q did the right thing, benching Kane for a few shifts, and not taking one of (or one of few in the Flyers case) your high offensive players completely out of the line up, but just letting him learn a lesson, in game? Talk to the kid, let him have a seat for a few shifts or even a period. Taking him out of 2 games is a ridiculous power trip by a power hungry coach.I realize I’m gonna feel dirty for agreeing with Bobby but the Flyer announcers on air were vocal that something needed to happen.
He was worse than pedestrian in his own zone. Kind of playing the half wall covering nobody waiting for his mates to win the puck for him.
Claiming (I rarely see flyer games) Tortorella after sitting him a few shifts even tried getting him to cover a point man … which is exactly what Q did with Patrick Kane after sitting him a few shifts. The difference is Kane accepted the role.
If you don’t make any effort at all defensively it means your linemates are always playing shorthanded.
I wrote they said he tried that. Didn’t work, not dressing had to be the next step and while some are pointing out the dumb penalty he was actually coming all the way back and playing his position. … not very well but honest effort is what he gave.So Q did the right thing, benching Kane for a few shifts, and not taking one of (or one of few in the Flyers case) your high offensive players completely out of the line up, but just letting him learn a lesson, in game? Talk to the kid, let him have a seat for a few shifts or even a period. Taking him out of 2 games is a ridiculous power trip by a power hungry coach.
Hence, the country club was formed.So Q did the right thing, benching Kane for a few shifts, and not taking one of (or one of few in the Flyers case) your high offensive players completely out of the line up, but just letting him learn a lesson, in game? Talk to the kid, let him have a seat for a few shifts or even a period. Taking him out of 2 games is a ridiculous power trip by a power hungry coach.
You mean the one that won 3 Stanley Cups? LolHence, the country club was formed.
Lol didn't work. Not one Flyer fan agrees with the move, that tells you all you need to know. Just because an announcer said that they agreed with it means diddly squat. He did the same shit with their captain last year, didn't make a difference.I wrote they said he tried that. Didn’t work, not dressing had to be the next step and while some are pointing out the dumb penalty he was actually coming all the way back and playing his position. … not very well but honest effort is what he gave.
The country club that won three cups.Hence, the country club was formed.