Since it was announced that you can edit overalls and potentials, would anyone want to work on a overhauled ratings system? Something with more disparity perhaps? I like having a big difference between playing with a Superstar and average players, the superstars should dominate most of the time.
Examples of tiers: (6 F 4 D 2G)
Tier 1 - Superstar players, 90-99
Crosby 96
Ovi 95
Tavares 93
Stamkos 93
Kane/Toews 92
Doughty 94
Keith 93
Weber 92
Karlsson 92
Price 94
Lundqvist 93
Tier 2 - All star caliber players, not a legit Superstar 86-89
Bergeron 89
Nash 89
Tarasenko 88
Seguin 88
Couture 87
RNH 86
Hedman 89
Josi - 88
Seabrook 87
Letang 86
Bishop 88
Bobrovsky 87
Tier 3 - Top 6, Top 4, good starting G 80-85
Stepan 85
Turris 85
Ladd 84
Saad 83
JVR 82
Soderbeg 80
Hamilton 85
Sekera 84
Goligoski 83
Seidenberg 81
Crawford 84
Halak 82
Tier 4 - Bottom 6, bottom pairing, backup G 75-79
Kelly 77
Bolland 77
Ott 76
Eller 79
Boyle 78
Campbell 75
Gleason 78
Jackman 77
Ference 76
Stuart 76
Enroth 78
Johnson 76
Tier 5 - 13th F/7th D, AHL quality - 74 and below
Should be self explanatory.
This was just a 1st draft I kind of just banged it out quick, they can definitely be tweaked. Here's an example of a roster with these ratings:
Schwartz (85) - Lehtera (82) - Tarasenko (88)
Steen (85) - Stastny (83) - Backes (84)
Jaskin (77) - Berglund (78) - Brouwer (80)
Ott (76) - Brodziak (76) - Reaves (75)
Bouwmeester (83) - Pietrangelo (89)
Gunnarsson (81) - Shattenkirk (88)
Lindbohm (76) - Bortuzzo (77)
Elliot (83)
Allen (82)
If anyone is interested PM me, would be easier to split it a few ways.
I would be interested! It would help answer some questions I have about the ratings for NHL'ers and prospects.
Such as:
Huge point producers such as: Crosby, Malkin, Stamkos, Ovechkin, Patrick Kane, Toews, Datzyuk, Giroux, Taraves, Backstrom are some of the most absolute elite players of the game, how high should they be rated into the 90's?
Should others (recent booms) such as: Seguin, Voracek
,Tarasenko, Tyler Johnson, Ryan Johanson, Kucherov, etc be considered within that elite and just how how should they be rated?
Narrowing out (
what should be a separate ratings system for prospects our rating system to catorigize high end prospects ratings and potentials
Ex. Recent mega picks such as: McDavid, Eichel, and Ekblad... how high should they be rated coming into the league? 80-84 ovr with 4-5 G? Or 86-90 with 4-5 Y?
Other prospects who are highly touted by still on cusp of cracking such as: Strome, Marner, Hafifin, Crouse, Rienhart, DriounDrioun, Elhers, Dall Colle, Bennett. How high should these guys be rated? 65-70 ovr with 4G or 72-77 ovr with 4 Y?
