hblueridgegal
We'll bounce back
This crossed my mind yesterday. She had a way of informing and speaking to a big chunk of the Canes' audience especially in times of uncertainty.
My question: is there a significant proportion of Canes fans who are that upset, or is it really a small fraction who make it look that way because of their habits on social media? And who project their feelings on the fan base in general?
Secondly, I still think the Borg makes a major acquisition this off season, rendering at least one of the criticisms moot. Of course I could be wrong, we'll find out shortly.
Depends on how “hardcore fan” the individual is. I’m assuming most casual fans will just see “Hey, Canes made the playoffs again. Neat, playoff games.”
Those who look more in depth will see the Canes have a chance to win the division, but it’s close, and they’ve not been winning games lately.
And those that have followed the team closely all season will know that the Canes had a pretty good cushion for the division lead not too long ago, and that cushion has completely evaporated due to their play of late.
Not to be there spokesperson for the third group because I'm certainly not, but there's something to it. There's no inconsistency to feeling this has been an overall excellent season and that the Svech injury is a complete "shit happens" situation, while also feeling that the org didn't do their due diligence on a Plan B in the case Meier feel through and the fact that the division hasn't been clinched yet is completely a reflection of that.Even that third group can be subdivided. Some hardcore fans (and the I'm sure the most angst-y) believe the Borg was negligent in not making a major acquisition at the deadline (regardless of the cost or who was realistically available?). Others believe that sometimes shit happens (Svech, Patches, possible NJ-SJ shenanigans?) and that it makes sense not to throw good money after bad.
What does ignore the issue mean?What the team can not afford to do is ignore it.
If the fan angst isnt addressed it will continue to build if things are not able to be fixed this offseason.
This is gonna be a true test of the front office.
If the team makes personnel decisions based on fan angst they aren’t winning a Stanley Cup because shock of all shocks most fans don’t know shit.What the team can not afford to do is ignore it.
If the fan angst isnt addressed it will continue to build if things are not able to be fixed this offseason.
This is gonna be a true test of the front office.
And those that have followed the team closely all season will know that the Canes had a pretty good cushion for the division lead not too long ago, and that cushion has completely evaporated due to their play of late.
4 weeks ago the devils shut out the canes the night after carolina lost svetch (and the game - another shutout) against vegas.
The devils then famously/foolishly tweeted with "corrected" standing showing themselves in first in the metro.
Four weeks ago, canes and devils were tied with the canes holding a game in hand. So how's this for crazy? In the past four weeks, in spite of the poor play, the canes position actually very slightly improved. They are now one point up instead of tied, with a game still in hand.
Similar to success, as the ticket prices rise, so do the expectations. And, from the sounds of it, some of the most loyal are being pushed out on the STM front. Sentiment and dissatisfaction can be affected by a number of factors - quite a balancing act.
The blowback on DW and management appears to be worst of it. Some RBA strategy and style criticisms cropping up as well. I don't see a lot of specific player bashing except for Andersen. The TD trade deadline interview really lit the fire if you ask me and then the post all-star slippage fueled it. A rare PR misstep, jmo. Demonstrates the power of the soundbite. Having other teams actually do what he was quoted only compounded it.
I think we forget how bad the angst was the final years of Karmanos and the first year of Dundon. in 17-18, We were actually in a playoff spot in Dec/Jan when we choked away a game against the Caps when, IIRC, Hanifin made a couple of defensive gaffs. The offseason moves were met with outright rage, particularly the Skinner trade.I wonder how much of the angst is a reflection of a changing mindset in the population in general? I get the feeling that there's more of an attitude of entitlement and aggrievement than we've ever had in the past. Fits in with the "quiet quitting" and no compunction in not giving notice when leaving a job that we hear about. Even where we're at as far as extreme political polarization: for many, nothing less than "100% my way" seems acceptable.
What does ignore the issue mean?
In reality the team didn’t ignore their needs this offseason. We added 50 goals from the year before but…
Patches and Kase got hurt
Stastny just sucked
Maybe don’t get unlucky when addressing the issue.
Goaltending wasn’t the issue coming into the year. We had the Jennings winners and then a really good young goaltender in the wings. Andersen didn’t recover and Kochetkov has been widely inconsistent
or any other day of the weekYou're not very good at Monday morning quarterbacking, are you?
i feel like i should lead off by saying i am not trying to argue that the canes' play for the last 1-2 months has been all that great, or inspiring of confidence ahead of the playoffs. in case anyone reads it that way.After the All-Star game (Feb 6), we had a 6 point lead over the Devils and a 12 point lead over the Rangers. Almost a month later, at the trade deadline (March 3), our lead dropped to 2 points over the Devils, 11 points over the Rangers. Today, it’s 1 point over the Devils, 3 over the Rangers.
You're wrong. Because of the 140 character limit, people really consider how they word their thoughts there.I think we all put way, way, way, way, way too much stock in what's said on Twitter. It's a bunch of babble that gives people angst for no reason.